Literature DB >> 21963957

Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses.

Adrian Săftoiu1, Peter Vilmann, Florin Gorunescu, Jan Janssen, Michael Hocke, Michael Larsen, Julio Iglesias-Garcia, Paolo Arcidiacono, Uwe Will, Marc Giovannini, Cristoph F Dietrich, Roald Havre, Cristian Gheorghe, Colin McKay, Dan Ionuţ Gheonea, Tudorel Ciurea.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: By using strain assessment, real-time endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography provides additional information about a lesion's characteristics in the pancreas. We assessed the accuracy of real-time EUS elastography in focal pancreatic lesions using computer-aided diagnosis by artificial neural network analysis.
METHODS: We performed a prospective, blinded, multicentric study at of 258 patients (774 recordings from EUS elastography) who were diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (n = 47) or pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 211) from 13 tertiary academic medical centers in Europe (the European EUS Elastography Multicentric Study Group). We used postprocessing software analysis to compute individual frames of elastography movies recorded by retrieving hue histogram data from a dynamic sequence of EUS elastography into a numeric matrix. The data then were analyzed in an extended neural network analysis, to automatically differentiate benign from malignant patterns.
RESULTS: The neural computing approach had 91.14% training accuracy (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.87%-92.42%) and 84.27% testing accuracy (95% CI, 83.09%-85.44%). These results were obtained using the 10-fold cross-validation technique. The statistical analysis of the classification process showed a sensitivity of 87.59%, a specificity of 82.94%, a positive predictive value of 96.25%, and a negative predictive value of 57.22%. Moreover, the corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91%-0.97%), which was significantly higher than the values obtained by simple mean hue histogram analysis, for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic was 0.85.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the artificial intelligence methodology via artificial neural networks supports the medical decision process, providing fast and accurate diagnoses.
Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21963957     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  38 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2012-01

Review 2.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

3.  Quantitative analysis of diagnosing pancreatic fibrosis using EUS-elastography (comparison with surgical specimens).

Authors:  Yuya Itoh; Akihiro Itoh; Hiroki Kawashima; Eizaburo Ohno; Yosuke Nakamura; Takeshi Hiramatsu; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Hajime Sumi; Daijuro Hayashi; Takamichi Kuwahara; Tomomasa Morishima; Kohei Funasaka; Masanao Nakamura; Ryoji Miyahara; Naoki Ohmiya; Yoshiaki Katano; Masatoshi Ishigami; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Ofelia Mosteanu; Radu Seicean
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Innovation in surgery/operating room driven by Internet of Things on medical devices.

Authors:  Yuki Ushimaru; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yoshihito Souma; Yoshitomo Yanagimoto; Hirotsugu Nagase; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tomoki Makino; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pancreatic cancer: Image enhancement by endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 7.  Elastography for the pancreas: Current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Natsuko Kawada; Sachiko Tanaka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Endoscopic ultrasound elastography strain histograms in the evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Dalibor Opačić; Nadan Rustemović; Mirjana Kalauz; Pave Markoš; Zvonimir Ostojić; Matea Majerović; Iva Ledinsky; Ana Višnjić; Juraj Krznarić; Milorad Opačić
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Strain Elastography - How To Do It?

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Richard G Barr; André Farrokh; Manjiri Dighe; Michael Hocke; Christian Jenssen; Yi Dong; Adrian Saftoiu; Roald Flesland Havre
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2017-12-07

10.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters in neural network diagnosis of liver tumors.

Authors:  Costin Teodor Streba; Mihaela Ionescu; Dan Ionut Gheonea; Larisa Sandulescu; Tudorel Ciurea; Adrian Saftoiu; Cristin Constantin Vere; Ion Rogoveanu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.