Literature DB >> 30671666

Innovation in surgery/operating room driven by Internet of Things on medical devices.

Yuki Ushimaru1,2, Tsuyoshi Takahashi2, Yoshihito Souma3, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto4, Hirotsugu Nagase5, Koji Tanaka2, Yasuhiro Miyazaki2, Tomoki Makino2, Yukinori Kurokawa2, Makoto Yamasaki2, Masaki Mori2, Yuichiro Doki2, Kiyokazu Nakajima6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the improvement of sensor technology, the trend of Internet of Things (IoT) is affecting the medical devices. The aim of this study is to verify whether it is possible to "visualize instrument usage in specific procedures" by automatically accumulating the digital data related to the behavior of surgical instruments/forceps in laparoscopic surgery.
METHODS: Five board-certified surgeons (PGY 9-24 years) performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy on 35-kg porcine (n = 5). Radio frequency identifier (RFID) was attached to each forceps with RFID readers installed on the left/right of the operating table. We automatically recorded the behavior by tracking the operator's right/left hands' forceps with RFID. The output sensor was installed in the electrocautery circuit for automatic recordings of the ON/OFF times and the activation time. All data were collected in dedicated software and used for analysis.
RESULTS: In all cases, the behaviors of forceps and electrocautery were successfully recorded. The median operation time was 1828 s (range 1159-2962 s), of which the electrocautery probe was the longest held on the right hand (1179 s, 75%), followed by Maryland dissectors (149 s, 10%), then clip appliers (91 s, 2%). In contrast, grasping forceps were mainly used in the left hand (1780 s, 93%). The activation time of electrocautery was only 8% of the total use and the remaining was mainly used for dissection. These situations were seen in common by all operators, but as a mentor surgeon, there was a tendency to change the right hand's instruments more frequently. The median activation time of electrocautery was 0.41 s, and these were confirmed to be 0.14-0.57 s among the operators.
CONCLUSION: By utilization of IoT for surgery, surgical procedure could be "visualized." This will improve the safety on surgery such as optimal usage of surgical devices, proper use of electrocautery, and standardization of the surgical procedures.

Keywords:  Information communication technology; Internet of Things; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; RFID; Tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30671666     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-06651-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

Review 1.  Lessons from outbreaks associated with bronchoscopy.

Authors:  D J Weber; W A Rutala
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  The Internet of things.

Authors:  Neil Gershenfeld; Raffi Krikorian; Danny Cohen
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Real-time monitoring for detection of retained surgical sponges and team motion in the surgical operation room using radio-frequency-identification (RFID) technology: a preclinical evaluation.

Authors:  Michael Kranzfelder; Dorit Zywitza; Thomas Jell; Armin Schneider; Sonja Gillen; Helmut Friess; Hubertus Feussner
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Florin Gorunescu; Jan Janssen; Michael Hocke; Michael Larsen; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Paolo Arcidiacono; Uwe Will; Marc Giovannini; Cristoph F Dietrich; Roald Havre; Cristian Gheorghe; Colin McKay; Dan Ionuţ Gheonea; Tudorel Ciurea
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies--Georgia, 2005.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  An outbreak of Mycobacterium chelonae infection following liposuction.

Authors:  Hildy Meyers; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Douglas Moore; Jan Curry; Cecile Truong; Yansheng Zhang; Richard J Wallace Jr
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Auto identification technology and its impact on patient safety in the Operating Room of the Future.

Authors:  Marie T Egan; Warren S Sandberg
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.058

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical compromise between French and American approach. Presentation of an original technique.

Authors:  Nicola Carlomagno; Michele Santangelo; Giuseppe Romagnuolo; Carmine Antropoli; Cristina La Tessa; Andrea Renda
Journal:  Ann Ital Chir       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.766

9.  CoLD: a versatile detection system for colorectal lesions in endoscopy video-frames.

Authors:  D E Maroulis; D K Iakovidis; S A Karkanis; D A Karras
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  American College of Chest Physicians and American Association for Bronchology [corrected] consensus statement: prevention of flexible bronchoscopy-associated infection.

Authors:  Atul C Mehta; Udaya B S Prakash; Robert Garland; Edward Haponik; Leonard Moses; William Schaffner; Gerard Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  A Smarter Health through the Internet of Surgical Things.

Authors:  Francesk Mulita; Georgios-Ioannis Verras; Christos-Nikolaos Anagnostopoulos; Konstantinos Kotis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Internet of Things (IoT) enabled healthcare helps to take the challenges of COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mohd Javaid; Ibrahim Haleem Khan
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-01-30

3.  Potential of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) applications in building a smart healthcare system: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Divya Mehrotra; Shaleen Chandra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-12-11

4.  Heparinized swine models for better surgical/endoscopic training.

Authors:  Yuto Kubo; Kotaro Yamashita; Takuro Saito; Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Application of multimodal identification technology in the innovative management operation department.

Authors:  Yan Zhu; Xiaojiao Sun; Yuemei Huang; Xiaochong Song; Li Liu; Laide Feng; Yujian Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-23

6.  The endoluminal pressures during flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Yuki Ushimaru; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masashi Hirota; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Kotaro Yamashita; Takuro Saito; Koji Tanaka; Tomoki Makino; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Makoto Yamasaki; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Healthcare assistance to COVID-19 patient using internet of things (IoT) enabled technologies.

Authors:  Naveen Mukati; Neha Namdev; R Dilip; N Hemalatha; Viney Dhiman; Bharti Sahu
Journal:  Mater Today Proc       Date:  2021-07-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.