Literature DB >> 22969209

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters in neural network diagnosis of liver tumors.

Costin Teodor Streba1, Mihaela Ionescu, Dan Ionut Gheonea, Larisa Sandulescu, Tudorel Ciurea, Adrian Saftoiu, Cristin Constantin Vere, Ion Rogoveanu.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the role of time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis parameters in a complex system of neural networks designed to classify liver tumors.
METHODS: We prospectively included 112 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 41), hypervascular (n = 20) and hypovascular (n = 12) liver metastases, hepatic hemangiomas (n = 16) or focal fatty changes (n = 23) who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Craiova, Romania. We recorded full length movies of all contrast uptake phases and post-processed them offline by selecting two areas of interest (one for the tumor and one for the healthy surrounding parenchyma) and consecutive TIC analysis. The difference in maximum intensities, the time to reaching them and the aspect of the late/portal phase, as quantified by the neural network and a ratio between median intensities of the central and peripheral areas were analyzed by a feed forward back propagation multi-layer neural network which was trained to classify data into five distinct classes, corresponding to each type of liver lesion.
RESULTS: The neural network had 94.45% training accuracy (95% CI: 89.31%-97.21%) and 87.12% testing accuracy (95% CI: 86.83%-93.17%). The automatic classification process registered 93.2% sensitivity, 89.7% specificity, 94.42% positive predictive value and 87.57% negative predictive value. The artificial neural networks (ANN) incorrectly classified as hemangyomas three HCC cases and two hypervascular metastases, while in turn misclassifying four liver hemangyomas as HCC (one case) and hypervascular metastases (three cases). Comparatively, human interpretation of TICs showed 94.1% sensitivity, 90.7% specificity, 95.11% positive predictive value and 88.89% negative predictive value. The accuracy and specificity of the ANN diagnosis system was similar to that of human interpretation of the TICs (P = 0.225 and P = 0.451, respectively). Hepatocellular carcinoma cases showed contrast uptake during the arterial phase followed by wash-out in the portal and first seconds of the late phases. For the hypovascular metastases did not show significant contrast uptake during the arterial phase, which resulted in negative differences between the maximum intensities. We registered wash-out in the late phase for most of the hypervascular metastases. Liver hemangiomas had contrast uptake in the arterial phase without agent wash-out in the portal-late phases. The focal fatty changes did not show any differences from surrounding liver parenchyma, resulting in similar TIC patterns and extracted parameters.
CONCLUSION: Neural network analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography - obtained TICs seems a promising field of development for future techniques, providing fast and reliable diagnostic aid for the clinician.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural network; Computer-aided diagnosis system; Contrast enhanced ultrasound; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver tumors; Time-intensity curve

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969209      PMCID: PMC3436061          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  26 in total

Review 1.  International experience on the use of artificial neural networks in gastroenterology.

Authors:  E Grossi; A Mancini; M Buscema
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 2.  Focal liver lesions: role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas Rettenbacher
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 3.  The use of artificial neural networks in decision support in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paulo J Lisboa; Azzam F G Taktak
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2006-02-14

Review 4.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Riccardo Lencioni; Fabio Piscaglia; Luigi Bolondi
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 25.083

5.  Prediction of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer patients with neural networks.

Authors:  K Droste; E Bollschweiler; T Waschulzik; T Schütz; R Engelbrecht; K Maruyama; J R Siewert
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1996-12-03       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Luigi Bolondi; Stefano Gaiani; Natascia Celli; Rita Golfieri; Walter Francesco Grigioni; Simona Leoni; Anna Maria Venturi; Fabio Piscaglia
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 17.425

7.  Differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia with quantitative parametric analysis in contrast-enhanced sonography.

Authors:  Cecile Huang-Wei; Aurore Bleuzen; Pascal Bourlier; Jérome Roumy; Ayache Bouakaz; Léandre Pourcelot; François Tranquart
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Artificial neural network to predict skeletal metastasis in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jainn-Shiun Chiu; Yuh-Feng Wang; Yu-Cheih Su; Ling-Huei Wei; Jian-Guo Liao; Yu-Chuan Li
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005.

Authors:  Sean F Altekruse; Katherine A McGlynn; Marsha E Reichman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Săftoiu; Peter Vilmann; Florin Gorunescu; Dan Ionuţ Gheonea; Marina Gorunescu; Tudorel Ciurea; Gabriel Lucian Popescu; Alexandru Iordache; Hazem Hassan; Sevastiţa Iordache
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Menglin Wu; Liang Li; Jiahui Wang; Yanyan Zhang; Qi Guo; Xue Li; Xuening Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  A Comprehensive Motion Compensation Method for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Motion in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions.

Authors:  Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai; Simona Turco; John R Eisenbrey; Corinne E Wessner; Alexandra Medellin-Kowalewski; Stephanie Wilson; Andrej Lyshchik; Aya Kamaya; Ahmed El Kaffas
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Deep learning radiomics for focal liver lesions diagnosis on long-range contrast-enhanced ultrasound and clinical factors.

Authors:  Li Liu; Chunlin Tang; Lu Li; Ping Chen; Ying Tan; Xiaofei Hu; Kaixuan Chen; Yongning Shang; Deng Liu; He Liu; Hongjun Liu; Fang Nie; Jiawei Tian; Mingchang Zhao; Wen He; Yanli Guo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

4.  Focal Liver Lesions: Computer-aided Diagnosis by Using Contrast-enhanced US Cine Recordings.

Authors:  Casey N Ta; Yuko Kono; Mohammad Eghtedari; Young Taik Oh; Michelle L Robbin; Richard G Barr; Andrew C Kummel; Robert F Mattrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Diagnosis system for hepatocellular carcinoma based on fractal dimension of morphometric elements integrated in an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Dan Ionuț Gheonea; Costin Teodor Streba; Cristin Constantin Vere; Mircea Şerbănescu; Daniel Pirici; Maria Comănescu; Letiția Adela Maria Streba; Marius Eugen Ciurea; Stelian Mogoantă; Ion Rogoveanu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  A novel model for predicting fatty liver disease by means of an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Yi-Shu Chen; Dan Chen; Chao Shen; Ming Chen; Chao-Hui Jin; Cheng-Fu Xu; Chao-Hui Yu; You-Ming Li
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2020-08-24

Review 7.  Deep learning in hepatocellular carcinoma: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Joseph C Ahn; Touseef Ahmad Qureshi; Amit G Singal; Debiao Li; Ju-Dong Yang
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-27

8.  The feasibility to use artificial intelligence to aid detecting focal liver lesions in real-time ultrasound: a preliminary study based on videos.

Authors:  Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai; Terapap Apiparakoon; Sanparith Marukatat; Sasima Sukcharoen; Sirinda Yimsawad; Oracha Chaichuen; Siwat Bhumiwat; Natthaporn Tanpowpong; Nutcha Pinjaroen; Rungsun Rerknimitr; Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Interpretable Machine Learning for Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions by Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Authors:  Simona Turco; Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai; Kambez Ebrahimkheil; John Eisenbrey; Aya Kamaya; Massimo Mischi; Andrej Lyshchik; Ahmed El Kaffas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Diagnosis of liver tumors by multimodal ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Jia Hu; Zhi-Yu Zhou; Hong-Ling Ran; Xin-Chun Yuan; Xi Zeng; Zhe-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.