BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DEHSI on T2-weighted MR imaging in preterm infants at term-equivalent age has been regarded as an unfavorable marker for neurodevelopmental outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the presence and extent of DEHSI and neurodevelopmental outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the MR images of 160 preterm infants at term-equivalent age. The presence of DEHSI was evaluated in separate regions and classified into 5 grades based on the extent of DEHSI. We also examined within those infants with DEHSI, whether typical signal-intensity characteristics of the posterior periventricular crossroads region were visible. Finally, ADC and FA values within the white matter were analyzed. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed at 2-year corrected age with a standardized neurologic examination and the BSID-II. RESULTS: The grade of DEHSI had significant linear trends with increasing ADC and a trend toward lower FA values. However, there was no relationship between the degree of DEHSI and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes. In contrast, 13 infants with DEHSI who did not have visible posterior crossroads had poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with infants with visible posterior crossroads. CONCLUSIONS: Although DEHSI may represent disturbances in white matter structure, as illustrated by its relationship to altered ADC and FA values, there is no relationship to short-term neurodevelopment outcome unless there are invisible posterior crossroads, representing a severe form of global high T2 signal intensity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DEHSI on T2-weighted MR imaging in preterm infants at term-equivalent age has been regarded as an unfavorable marker for neurodevelopmental outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between the presence and extent of DEHSI and neurodevelopmental outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the MR images of 160 preterm infants at term-equivalent age. The presence of DEHSI was evaluated in separate regions and classified into 5 grades based on the extent of DEHSI. We also examined within those infants with DEHSI, whether typical signal-intensity characteristics of the posterior periventricular crossroads region were visible. Finally, ADC and FA values within the white matter were analyzed. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were assessed at 2-year corrected age with a standardized neurologic examination and the BSID-II. RESULTS: The grade of DEHSI had significant linear trends with increasing ADC and a trend toward lower FA values. However, there was no relationship between the degree of DEHSI and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes. In contrast, 13 infants with DEHSI who did not have visible posterior crossroads had poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with infants with visible posterior crossroads. CONCLUSIONS: Although DEHSI may represent disturbances in white matter structure, as illustrated by its relationship to altered ADC and FA values, there is no relationship to short-term neurodevelopment outcome unless there are invisible posterior crossroads, representing a severe form of global high T2 signal intensity.
Authors: Serena J Counsell; Joanna M Allsop; Michael C Harrison; David J Larkman; Nigel L Kennea; Olga Kapellou; Frances M Cowan; Joseph V Hajnal; A David Edwards; Mary A Rutherford Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Daniela Prayer; Gregor Kasprian; Elisabeth Krampl; Barbara Ulm; Linde Witzani; Lucas Prayer; Peter C Brugger Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: J F Schneider; S Confort-Gouny; Y Le Fur; P Viout; M Bennathan; F Chapon; C Fogliarini; P Cozzone; N Girard Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Cornelia F Hagmann; Enrico De Vita; Alan Bainbridge; Roxanna Gunny; Andrew B Kapetanakis; Wui K Chong; Ernest B Cady; David G Gadian; Nicola J Robertson Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: J J Neil; S I Shiran; R C McKinstry; G L Schefft; A Z Snyder; C R Almli; E Akbudak; J A Aronovitz; J P Miller; B C Lee; T E Conturo Journal: Radiology Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lianne J Woodward; Peter J Anderson; Nicola C Austin; Kelly Howard; Terrie E Inder Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: K J Rademaker; C S P M Uiterwaal; F J A Beek; I C van Haastert; A F Lieftink; F Groenendaal; D E Grobbee; L S de Vries Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2005-06-14 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Jessica L Wisnowski; Rafael C Ceschin; So Young Choi; Vincent J Schmithorst; Michael J Painter; Marvin D Nelson; Stefan Blüml; Ashok Panigrahy Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: M Weinstein; D Ben Bashat; V Gross-Tsur; Y Leitner; I Berger; R Marom; R Geva; S Uliel; L Ben-Sira Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Lana Vasung; Caitlin K Rollins; Hyuk Jin Yun; Clemente Velasco-Annis; Jennings Zhang; Konrad Wagstyl; Alan Evans; Simon K Warfield; Henry A Feldman; P Ellen Grant; Ali Gholipour Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Jessica Rose; Katelyn Cahill-Rowley; Rachel Vassar; Kristen W Yeom; Ximena Stecher; David K Stevenson; Susan R Hintz; Naama Barnea-Goraly Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 3.756