BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The accuracy of cranial sonography (US) in characterizing white matter (WM) injury in the premature infant is unclear. This study was aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of serial cranial US during the first 6 weeks of life in comparison to MR imaging at term (week of expected delivery) in characterizing the presence of WM injury in a cohort of 96 very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHOD: A blinded investigator reviewed serial cranial sonograms for the presence of WM echolucency and echodensity, including its duration and extent. These abnormalities were compared with a second independent investigator's evaluation to determine the sensitivity and specificity of cranial WM abnormalities at US. RESULTS: The presence of prolonged echodensity (>7 days) in the WM on neonatal cranial sonograms demonstrated low sensitivity (26%) and a low positive predictive value (36%) for the presence of noncystic WM injury, as detected on MR images at term. Extensive cystic lesions detected on MR images were all identified during earlier cranial US. CONCLUSION: Neonatal cranial US of the VLBW infant demonstrates high reliability in the detection of cystic WM injury but has significant limitations in the demonstration of noncystic WM injury. This deficiency of neonatal cranial US is important, because noncystic WM injury is considerably more common than cystic WM injury.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The accuracy of cranial sonography (US) in characterizing white matter (WM) injury in the premature infant is unclear. This study was aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of serial cranial US during the first 6 weeks of life in comparison to MR imaging at term (week of expected delivery) in characterizing the presence of WM injury in a cohort of 96 very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHOD: A blinded investigator reviewed serial cranial sonograms for the presence of WM echolucency and echodensity, including its duration and extent. These abnormalities were compared with a second independent investigator's evaluation to determine the sensitivity and specificity of cranial WM abnormalities at US. RESULTS: The presence of prolonged echodensity (>7 days) in the WM on neonatal cranial sonograms demonstrated low sensitivity (26%) and a low positive predictive value (36%) for the presence of noncystic WM injury, as detected on MR images at term. Extensive cystic lesions detected on MR images were all identified during earlier cranial US. CONCLUSION: Neonatal cranial US of the VLBW infant demonstrates high reliability in the detection of cystic WM injury but has significant limitations in the demonstration of noncystic WM injury. This deficiency of neonatal cranial US is important, because noncystic WM injury is considerably more common than cystic WM injury.
Authors: G van Wezel-Meijler; M S van der Knaap; J Oosting; L T Sie; L de Groot; J Huisman; J Valk; H N Lafeber Journal: Neuropediatrics Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 1.947
Authors: A M Roelants-van Rijn; F Groenendaal; F J Beek; P Eken; I C van Haastert; L S de Vries Journal: Neuropediatrics Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 1.947
Authors: E F Maalouf; P J Duggan; S J Counsell; M A Rutherford; F Cowan; D Azzopardi; A D Edwards Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: E Schouman-Claeys; M C Henry-Feugeas; F Roset; J C Larroche; D Hassine; J C Sadik; G Frija; J C Gabilan Journal: Radiology Date: 1993-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Monica Epelman; Alan Daneman; Christian J Kellenberger; Abdul Aziz; Osnat Konen; Rahim Moineddin; Hilary Whyte; Susan Blaser Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2010-04-22
Authors: Kalpathy S Krishnamoorthy; Karl C K Kuban; T Michael O'Shea; Sjirk J Westra; Elizabeth N Allred; Alan Leviton Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Joshua R Buser; Jennifer Maire; Art Riddle; Xi Gong; Thuan Nguyen; Kerst Nelson; Ning Ling Luo; Jennifer Ren; Jaime Struve; Larry S Sherman; Steven P Miller; Vann Chau; Glenda Hendson; Praveen Ballabh; Marjorie R Grafe; Stephen A Back Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 10.422