Sonia Francesca Calloni1, Claudia Maria Cinnante2, Laura Bassi3, Sabrina Avignone2, Monica Fumagalli3, Luke Bonello4, Dario Consonni5, Odoardo Picciolini3, Fabio Mosca3, Fabio Triulzi2. 1. School of Medicine, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. sonia.calloni@unimi.it. 2. Department of Neuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 3. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Clinical Science and Community Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 4. School of Medicine, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To understand the meaning of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) of white matter (WM), a frequently observed finding on MR in VLBW infants at a corrected term age. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Qualitative visual assessment of cerebral WM signal intensity on T2WI was performed by two readers on 78 VLBW infants, scanned on a 1.5 T-MRI at term equivalent age. ADC values were then measured in six regions of interest: four in frontal and parietal periventricular and two in parietal subcortical WM. Mean ADC values were then compared with qualitative visual assessment and with mean ADC values obtained ten term healthy babies. Both periventricular and subcortical mean ADC values were correlated with the neurological follow-up, evaluated with the Griffith's mental developmental scale at 36 months. RESULTS: There was no agreement between the visual qualitative assessment of white matter DEHSI and corresponding ADC values (P values = 0.42 for periventricular WM; P values = 0.18 for subcortical WM). Mean ADC values were higher in preterms than in term babies (P values <0.001). No significant correlation was found between ADC values and the developmental quotient at 36 months (P values >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DEHSI in VLBW infants is a MR finding poorly defined with conventional T2 MRI. The presence of T2 hyperintensities weakly correlates with ADC, and ADC values are not associated with the neurological long-term outcome at 3 years, demonstrating that DEHSI should not be considered as a WM disease.
PURPOSE: To understand the meaning of diffuse excessive high signal intensity (DEHSI) of white matter (WM), a frequently observed finding on MR in VLBW infants at a corrected term age. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Qualitative visual assessment of cerebral WM signal intensity on T2WI was performed by two readers on 78 VLBW infants, scanned on a 1.5 T-MRI at term equivalent age. ADC values were then measured in six regions of interest: four in frontal and parietal periventricular and two in parietal subcortical WM. Mean ADC values were then compared with qualitative visual assessment and with mean ADC values obtained ten term healthy babies. Both periventricular and subcortical mean ADC values were correlated with the neurological follow-up, evaluated with the Griffith's mental developmental scale at 36 months. RESULTS: There was no agreement between the visual qualitative assessment of white matter DEHSI and corresponding ADC values (P values = 0.42 for periventricular WM; P values = 0.18 for subcortical WM). Mean ADC values were higher in preterms than in term babies (P values <0.001). No significant correlation was found between ADC values and the developmental quotient at 36 months (P values >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DEHSI in VLBW infants is a MR finding poorly defined with conventional T2 MRI. The presence of T2 hyperintensities weakly correlates with ADC, and ADC values are not associated with the neurological long-term outcome at 3 years, demonstrating that DEHSI should not be considered as a WM disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain imaging; Diffuse excessive high signal intensity; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neurodevelopment; Premature infants; White matter
Authors: E F Maalouf; P J Duggan; M A Rutherford; S J Counsell; A M Fletcher; M Battin; F Cowan; A D Edwards Journal: J Pediatr Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: P S Hüppi; B Murphy; S E Maier; G P Zientara; T E Inder; P D Barnes; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; J J Volpe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Francisca T de Bruïne; Annette A van den Berg-Huysmans; Lara M Leijser; Monique Rijken; Sylke J Steggerda; Jeroen van der Grond; Gerda van Wezel-Meijler Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Shannon E G Hamrick; Steven P Miller; Carol Leonard; David V Glidden; Ruth Goldstein; Vijay Ramaswamy; Robert Piecuch; Donna M Ferriero Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Anthony R Hart; Elspeth H Whitby; Simon J Clark; Martyn N J Paley; Michael F Smith Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Jessica L Wisnowski; Vincent J Schmithorst; Tena Rosser; Lisa Paquette; Marvin D Nelson; Robin L Haynes; Michael J Painter; Stefan Blüml; Ashok Panigrahy Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 2.995
Authors: Ines M Mürner-Lavanchy; Hiroyuki Kidokoro; Deanne K Thompson; Lex W Doyle; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Rod W Hunt; Terrie E Inder; Peter J Anderson Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Abbot R Laptook; Seetha Shankaran; Patrick Barnes; Nancy Rollins; Barbara T Do; Nehal A Parikh; Shannon Hamrick; Susan R Hintz; Jon E Tyson; Edward F Bell; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Ronald N Goldberg; Athina Pappas; Carolyn Huitema; Claudia Pedroza; Aasma S Chaudhary; Angelita M Hensman; Abhik Das; Myra Wyckoff; Amir Khan; Michelle C Walsh; Kristi L Watterberg; Roger Faix; William Truog; Ronnie Guillet; Gregory M Sokol; Brenda B Poindexter; Rosemary D Higgins Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Hailong Li; Nehal A Parikh; Jinghua Wang; Stephanie Merhar; Ming Chen; Milan Parikh; Scott Holland; Lili He Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 4.677