Literature DB >> 21960211

Comparison of two immunoassays in the determination of IGF-I levels and its correlation with oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and with clinical symptoms in acromegalic patients.

Laura Boero1, Marcos Manavela, Karina Danilowicz, Analia Alfieri, Maria Carolina Ballarino, Alberto Chervin, Natalia García-Basavilbaso, Mariela Glerean, Mirtha Guitelman, Monica Graciela Loto, Jose Alberto Nahmías, Amelia Susana Rogozinski, Marisa Servidio, Nicolas Marcelo Vitale, Débora Katz, Patricia Fainstein Day, Graciela Stalldecker, Maria Susana Mallea-Gil.   

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate two different methodologies in IGF-I levels determination, its correlation with GH nadir in OGTT <1 and <0.4 ng/ml and with clinical symptoms in acromegalic patients. We analyzed 37 patients. Sixteen patients had not undergone any kind of treatment (Group 1). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery as primary treatment, and after that, some of them another kind of treatment (except pegvisomant) (Group 2). Serum IGF-I levels were measured by Immulite-1000 (IMM) and by an immunoradiometric assay (DSL) and, GH by immunochemiluminometric assay. IGF-I levels by IMM and by DSL showed a significant difference. When we analyzed in both groups the concordance by crosstabs-Kappa coefficients, between different parameters, GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml with IGF-I by DSL and IMM showed concordance in group 1, but in group 2 only GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml had a weak concordance with IGF-I by IMM. When we analyzed clinical symptoms in the patients and, GH nadir <1 and <0.4 ng/ml and IGF-I levels by both methodologies, more than 90% of clinically active patients had abnormal GH response or/and elevated IGF-I levels in group 1, but less than 70% in group 2. In the 8 patients under medical treatment, GH nadir was higher than 0.4 ng/ml in all patients, and IGF-I levels were elevated in 8/8 by DSL and in 6/8 by IMM. In conclusion, discrepant GH and IGF-I levels in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with acromegaly requires consideration of many factors that influence these parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21960211     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-011-0351-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  35 in total

1.  Usefulness of different biochemical markers of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) family in diagnosing growth hormone excess and deficiency in adults.

Authors:  P Marzullo; C Di Somma; K L Pratt; J Khosravi; A Diamandis; G Lombardi; A Colao; R G Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Serum insulin-like growth factor-I measurement in the follow-up of treated acromegaly: comparison of four immunoassays.

Authors:  C Massart; J Y Poirier
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 3.  Hormonal and nutritional regulation of IGF-I and its binding proteins.

Authors:  L E Underwood; J P Thissen; S Lemozy; J M Ketelslegers; D R Clemmons
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1994

4.  Failure of acid-ethanol treatment to prevent interference by binding proteins in radioligand assays for the insulin-like growth factors.

Authors:  S Mesiano; I R Young; C A Browne; G D Thorburn
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  Serum IGF-I measured by four different immunoassays in patients with adult GH deficiency or acromegaly and in a control population.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Granada; Angels Ulied; Felipe F Casanueva; Antonio Pico; Tomas Lucas; Elena Torres; Anna Sanmartí
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 3.478

6.  Treatment of acromegaly with SS analogues: should GH and IGF-I target levels be lowered to assert a tight control of the disease?

Authors:  R Cozzi; R Attanasio; S Grottoli; G Pagani; P Loli; V Gasco; A M Pedroncelli; M Montini; E Ghigo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 7.  Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Significance of "abnormal" nadir growth hormone levels after oral glucose in postoperative patients with acromegaly in remission with normal insulin-like growth factor-I levels.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Abu T Nuruzzaman; Carlos M Reyes; Robert E Sundeen; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Persistence of rapid growth hormone (GH) pulsatility after successful removal of GH-producing pituitary tumors.

Authors:  P J Ho; C A Jaffe; R D Friberg; W F Chandler; A L Barkan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  IGF-I assays: current assay methodologies and their limitations.

Authors:  David R Clemmons
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  8 in total

1.  Discordant growth hormone and IGF-1 levels post pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly naïve to medical therapy and radiation: what to follow, GH or IGF-1 values?

Authors:  Jessica A Brzana; Chris G Yedinak; Johnny B Delashaw; Hume S Gultelkin; David Cook; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Clinical features and natural course of acromegaly in patients with discordance in the nadir GH level on the oral glucose test and the IGF-1 value at 3 months after adenomectomy.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kinoshita; Atsushi Tominaga; Satoshi Usui; Kazunori Arita; Tetsuhiko Sakoguchi; Kazuhiko Sugiyama; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  Management options for persistent postoperative acromegaly.

Authors:  Nestoras Mathioudakis; Roberto Salvatori
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 5.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Prognostic value of nadir GH levels for long-term biochemical remission or recurrence in surgically treated acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Jeffrey N Bruce; Carlos Reyes-Vidal; Simran Singh; Yessica DeLeon; Zhezhen Jin; Alexander G Khandji; Serge Cremers; Kalmon D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Medical therapy of acromegaly.

Authors:  U Plöckinger
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.257

8.  Reevaluation of Acromegalic Patients in Long-Term Remission according to Newly Proposed Consensus Criteria for Control of Disease.

Authors:  Elisa Verrua; Emanuele Ferrante; Marcello Filopanti; Elena Malchiodi; Elisa Sala; Claudia Giavoli; Maura Arosio; Andrea Gerardo Lania; Cristina Lucia Ronchi; Giovanna Mantovani; Paolo Beck-Peccoz; Anna Spada
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.257

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.