Literature DB >> 22183781

Discordant growth hormone and IGF-1 levels post pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly naïve to medical therapy and radiation: what to follow, GH or IGF-1 values?

Jessica A Brzana1, Chris G Yedinak, Johnny B Delashaw, Hume S Gultelkin, David Cook, Maria Fleseriu.   

Abstract

New criteria that define acromegaly remission are more stringent: normal (age/sex-adjusted) insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1), growth hormone (GH) random (GHr) <1 μg/L, and a GH nadir (GHn) during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) of <0.4 μg/L. Discordance between GH and IGF-1 values is often attributed to somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) or radiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of discordant IGF-1 and GH levels in patients with GH secreting adenomas (after pituitary surgery), who were naïve to any other treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data over a 5 year time period (2006-2010), in post-surgery acromegaly patients who had elevated IGF-1 but normal GH levels (per the new cure criteria). Symptoms of acromegaly were scored according to a 4-point scale. Fifty-four patients had post-operative GHr and IGF-1 measurements, 28 patients had GHn during OGTT, and 16 patients had 5-point 2-h GH day curve tests. Thirteen of 54 (24%) patients were found to have intermittent persistent discordant values; high IGF-1 and normal GH at final evaluation (77% of these patients were women). Patients had a median number of IGF-1 evaluations of 7.5 (range: 2-15) over a median of 22 months (range: 3-47 months). Mean elevated IGF-1 in the discordant population was 1.25 × upper limit of normal (ULN) ± 0.17 (range: 1.01-1.6 × ULN). Twelve of the 13 (92%) patients had macroadenomas; 10 of the 13 (69%) patients had mammosomatotroph, mixed lacto/somatotroph tumors or prolactin staining. No patient in the discordant population was on estrogen replacement therapy or had overt cardiac disease. When the relatively asymptomatic discordant population was compared with 35 patients from the concordant population (six were excluded because of preoperative medical treatment for acromegaly), no significant difference between age, gender distribution, body mass index (BMI), presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) or glucose intolerance and adrenal insufficiency between groups was noted. In our study of postoperative patients with acromegaly naïve to both SRLs and radiation, using new GH cut-off levels, 24% had intermittent or persistent discordant values. Our results highlight that relying on IGF-1 or GH measurements alone is not adequate for assessing disease control in surgically treated acromegaly patients. Management of such patients needs to be individualized and long-term studies evaluating morbidity and mortality incorporated into treatment decisions. Further studies with larger patient populations and longer follow-up are required to determine the long-term implications of discordant GH and IGF-1 value patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22183781     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-011-0369-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  33 in total

1.  AACE Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly.

Authors:  David M Cook; Shereen Ezzat; Laurence Katznelson; David L Kleinberg; Edward R Laws; Todd B Nippoldt; Brooke Swearingen; Mary Lee Vance
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: remission using modern criteria, complications, and predictors of outcome.

Authors:  John A Jane; Robert M Starke; Mohamed A Elzoghby; Davis L Reames; Spencer C Payne; Michael O Thorner; John C Marshall; Edward R Laws; Mary Lee Vance
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Basal, but not pulsatile, growth hormone secretion determines the ambient circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor-I.

Authors:  Alexander T Faje; Ariel L Barkan
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Screening for acromegaly by application of a simple questionnaire evaluating the enlargement of extremities in adult patients seen at primary health care units.

Authors:  Pedro Weslley Rosario; Maria Regina Calsolari
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

5.  Biochemical diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in acromegaly: a two-decade experience.

Authors:  Francesco M Minuto; Eugenia Resmini; Mara Boschetti; Alberto Rebora; Laura Fazzuoli; Marica Arvigo; Massimo Giusti; Diego Ferone
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  Epidemiology of acromegaly.

Authors:  I M Holdaway; C Rajasoorya
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Monitoring disease activity using GH and IGF-I in the follow-up of 501 patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  M Sherlock; A Aragon Alonso; R C Reulen; J Ayuk; R N Clayton; G Holder; M C Sheppard; A Bates; P M Stewart
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 8.  Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a community-based, cross-sectional study in Banbury (Oxfordshire, UK).

Authors:  Alberto Fernandez; Niki Karavitaki; John A H Wass
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  D3 GH receptor polymorphism is not associated with IGF1 levels in untreated acromegaly.

Authors:  Peter Kamenicky; Christine Dos Santos; Consuelo Espinosa; Sylvie Salenave; Françoise Galland; Yves Le Bouc; Patrick Maison; Pierre Bougnères; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.664

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Silent somatotroph pituitary adenomas: an update.

Authors:  Fabienne Langlois; Randall Woltjer; Justin S Cetas; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

2.  Endoscopic endonasal approach for growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas: outcomes in 53 patients using 2010 consensus criteria for remission.

Authors:  Samuel S Shin; Matthew J Tormenti; Alessandro Paluzzi; William E Rothfus; Yue-Fang Chang; Hanady Zainah; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Carl H Snyderman; Sue M Challinor; Paul A Gardner
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  SOCS2 polymorphisms are not associated with clinical and biochemical phenotypes in acromegalic patients.

Authors:  Ericka B Trarbach; Alexander A Jorge; Felipe H Duarte; Marcello D Bronstein; Raquel S Jallad
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.107

4.  ACROMEGALY AND A GIANT RETROPERITONEAL LIPOSARCOMA PRODUCING IGF-1.

Authors:  César Ernesto Lam-Chung; Diana Lizbeth Rodríguez-Orihuela; Rebeca Arízaga-Ramírez; Paloma Almeda-Valdés; Ana Karen Castillo-Valdez; Kassandra Magaña-Pérez; José Luis Ventura-Gallegos; Armando Gamboa-Domínguez; Jazmín De Anda González; Francisco J Gómez-Pérez; Daniel Cuevas-Ramos
Journal:  AACE Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-03

Review 5.  Management options for persistent postoperative acromegaly.

Authors:  Nestoras Mathioudakis; Roberto Salvatori
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 6.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  The clinical and cardiometabolic effects of d3-growth hormone receptor polymorphism in acromegaly.

Authors:  Nese Cinar; Selcuk Dagdelen; Hikmet Yorgun; Ugur Canpolat; Giray Kabakçı; Tomris Erbas
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Twenty-four-hour growth hormone profiling in the assessment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Robert D'Arcy; C Hamish Courtney; Una Graham; Steven Hunter; David R McCance; Karen Mullan
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 9.  A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes.

Authors:  Shlomo Melmed; Marcello D Bronstein; Philippe Chanson; Anne Klibanski; Felipe F Casanueva; John A H Wass; Christian J Strasburger; Anton Luger; David R Clemmons; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 43.330

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.