BACKGROUND: IGF-I is a useful tool in GH disorders diagnosis, however, the use of commercially available kits needs to be validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of serum IGF-I concentrations measured by four immunoassays in the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency and acromegaly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: Fifty GH-deficient (GHD) patients, 41 acromegaly patients and 405 controls. MEASUREMENTS: Serum IGF-I concentrations were measured by four commercial immunoassays: (1) RIA-NICHOLS; (2) ICMA-IMMULITE; (3) IRMA-IMMUNOTECH; and (4) non-extraction-IRMA-DSL. Reference values were established from the control population in six age groups. Individual results were transformed to standard deviation score (SD score) from the age-related reference population and reference data provided by each assay manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivity for GH deficiency was calculated. RESULTS: IGF-I measured by the four assays differed significantly. In controls, assay 2 yielded the lowest results, followed by assays 1, 3 and 4 (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). IGF-I declined with age, but no sex-related differences were observed. When IGF-I was standardized with respect to reference data obtained from the manufacturers, it showed better sensitivity in assays 1 and 2, than with our controls (65%vs. 77.5% and 58%vs. 70%, respectively) for GHD diagnosis. With assays 3 and 4, higher sensitivity was obtained when standardized with our controls (62%vs. 52% and 56%vs. 36%, respectively). In acromegaly, IGF-I was > 2 SD score with all assays. CONCLUSIONS: IGF-I SD score for GHD diagnosis differed according to the normative data used. All assays proved to be useful for active acromegaly diagnosis.
BACKGROUND:IGF-I is a useful tool in GH disorders diagnosis, however, the use of commercially available kits needs to be validated. OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of serum IGF-I concentrations measured by four immunoassays in the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency and acromegaly. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PATIENTS: Fifty GH-deficient (GHD) patients, 41 acromegalypatients and 405 controls. MEASUREMENTS: Serum IGF-I concentrations were measured by four commercial immunoassays: (1) RIA-NICHOLS; (2) ICMA-IMMULITE; (3) IRMA-IMMUNOTECH; and (4) non-extraction-IRMA-DSL. Reference values were established from the control population in six age groups. Individual results were transformed to standard deviation score (SD score) from the age-related reference population and reference data provided by each assay manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivity for GH deficiency was calculated. RESULTS:IGF-I measured by the four assays differed significantly. In controls, assay 2 yielded the lowest results, followed by assays 1, 3 and 4 (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). IGF-I declined with age, but no sex-related differences were observed. When IGF-I was standardized with respect to reference data obtained from the manufacturers, it showed better sensitivity in assays 1 and 2, than with our controls (65%vs. 77.5% and 58%vs. 70%, respectively) for GHD diagnosis. With assays 3 and 4, higher sensitivity was obtained when standardized with our controls (62%vs. 52% and 56%vs. 36%, respectively). In acromegaly, IGF-I was > 2 SD score with all assays. CONCLUSIONS:IGF-I SD score for GHD diagnosis differed according to the normative data used. All assays proved to be useful for active acromegaly diagnosis.
Authors: Vivien Bonert; John Carmichael; Zengru Wu; James Mirocha; Daniel A Perez; Nigel J Clarke; Richard E Reitz; Michael J McPhaul; Adam Mamelak Journal: Pituitary Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Chino S Aneke-Nash; Clara Dominguez-Islas; Petra Bůžková; Qibin Qi; Xiaonan Xue; Michael Pollak; Howard D Strickler; Robert C Kaplan Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2015-12-08 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Inas H Thomas; Janet E Donohue; Kirsten K Ness; Donald R Dengel; K Scott Baker; James G Gurney Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ioannis Ilias; Thomas Paparrigopoulos; Elias Tzavellas; Dimitris Karaiskos; Panagiotis Kontoleon; Ioannis Liappas Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2011-10