Literature DB >> 21958917

Advances in outcomes measurement in rehabilitation medicine: current initiatives from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.

David S Tulsky1, Noelle E Carlozzi, David Cella.   

Abstract

The articles in this supplement present recent advances in the measurement of patient-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes. Specifically, these articles highlight the combined efforts of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Center on Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, and Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service to improve HRQOL measurement. In addition, this supplement is intended to provide rehabilitation professionals with information about these efforts and the implications that these advances in outcomes measurement have for rehabilitation medicine and clinical practice. These new measurement scales use state-of-the-art method techniques, including item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. In addition, scale development involves both qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as the administration of items to hundreds or even thousands of research participants. The scales deliberately have been built with overlap of items between scales so that linkages and equivalency scores can be computed. Ultimately, these scales should facilitate direct comparison of outcomes instruments across studies and will serve as standard data elements across research trials without compromising the specificity of disease- or condition-targeted measures. This supplement includes the initial publications for many of these new measurement initiatives, each of which provides researchers and clinicians with better tools for evaluation of the efficacy of their interventions.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958917      PMCID: PMC4425123          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  23 in total

1.  Quality of life measurement in rehabilitation medicine: building an agenda for the future.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Mitchell Rosenthal
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research.

Authors:  Allen W Heinemann
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Linking the activity measure for post acute care and the quality of life outcomes in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Jin-Shei Lai; Feng Tian; Wendy J Coster; Alan M Jette; Donald Straub; David Cella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Developing a contemporary patient-reported outcomes measure for spinal cord injury.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Pamela A Kisala; David Victorson; Denise Tate; Allen W Heinemann; Dagmar Amtmann; David Cella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Clinical trials in rehabilitation: single or multiple outcomes?

Authors:  Emilia Bagiella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Outcomes research: measuring the end results of health care.

Authors:  C M Clancy; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-10-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Staquet; R Berzon; D Osoba; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; M J Muller; L D Wever; J H Schornagel; N K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life outcomes measures.

Authors:  E M Andresen; A R Meyers
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  13 in total

1.  Making the best match: selecting outcome measures for clinical trials and outcome studies.

Authors:  Wendy J Coster
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

2.  Development of a paper-and-pencil semi-adaptive questionnaire for 5 domains of health-related quality of life (PAT-5D-QOL).

Authors:  Jacek A Kopec; Eric C Sayre; Aileen M Davis; Elizabeth M Badley; Michal Abrahamowicz; Jacques Pouchot; Lesley Sherlock; John M Esdaile
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease.

Authors:  Denise G Tate; Tracey Wheeler; Giulia I Lane; Martin Forchheimer; Kim D Anderson; Fin Biering-Sorensen; Anne P Cameron; Bruno Gallo Santacruz; Lyn B Jakeman; Michael J Kennelly; Steve Kirshblum; Andrei Krassioukov; Klaus Krogh; M J Mulcahey; Vanessa K Noonan; Gianna M Rodriguez; Ann M Spungen; David Tulsky; Marcel W Post
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.985

4. 

Authors:  Julie Richardson
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.037

5.  Functional Status as a Central Indicator of Health Status: The Role of Physiotherapy.

Authors:  Julie Richardson
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Review of cross-cultural issues related to quality of life after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Denise Tate; Martin Forchheimer
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2014

7.  Confirmatory factor analysis of the neck disability index, comparing patients with whiplash associated disorders to a control group with non-specific neck pain.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Antonio Cuesta-Vargas; Sebastian Barr; Stephanie Winkeljohn Black; Jason W Osborne; Markus Melloh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Measurement Precision and Efficiency of Computerized Adaptive Testing for the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale in People With Stroke.

Authors:  Bryant A Seamon; Steven A Kautz; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2021-04-04

9.  Association of Postoperative Opioid Prescription Size and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Brian T Fry; Ryan A Howard; Vidhya Gunaseelan; Jay S Lee; Jennifer F Waljee; Michael J Englesbe; Joceline V Vu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

10.  The Spinal Cord Injury--Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system: Development, psychometrics, and item bank calibration.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Pamela A Kisala
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.