Literature DB >> 8973129

Guidelines for reporting results of quality of life assessments in clinical trials.

M Staquet1, R Berzon, D Osoba, D Machin.   

Abstract

Clinical trials involving quality of life measurement published in the literature suffer from important weaknesses due to the lack of information on numerous topics. The psychometric properties of the instruments are often lacking as well as data on the number of patients treated and analyzed. The handling of missing data is rarely documented. In order to facilitate the reporting of trials and the evaluation of published results, this article proposes a set of general guidelines for the reporting of clinical trials which include a quality of life assessment. A checklist designed to assist authors is appended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8973129     DOI: 10.1007/bf00540022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  12 in total

1.  Quality of life as outcome measures in randomized clinical trials. An overview of three general medical journals.

Authors:  S J Veldhuyzen Van Zanten
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

Review 2.  Assessment of quality of life in clinical trials.

Authors:  M Schumacher; M Olschewski; G Schulgen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Approaches to the analysis of quality of life data: experiences gained from a medical research council lung cancer working party palliative chemotherapy trial.

Authors:  P Hopwood; R J Stephens; D Machin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Checklist of information for inclusion in reports of clinical trials. The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Quality-of-life measurements in the evaluation of treatment: proposed guidelines.

Authors:  A Fletcher
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Methodological and statistical problems in the construction of composite measurement scales: a survey of six medical and epidemiological journals.

Authors:  J Coste; J Fermanian; A Venot
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A proposal for structured reporting of randomized controlled trials. The Standards of Reporting Trials Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.

Authors:  D G Altman; S M Gore; M J Gardner; S J Pocock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-07

Review 10.  Assessing quality of life in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  C C Gotay; T D Moore
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Brenda Bass; Judith Davidson; John Queenan; Andrea Bezjak; Jolie Ringash; Anna Wilkinson; Deb Feldman-Stewart
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Advances in outcomes measurement in rehabilitation medicine: current initiatives from the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  David S Tulsky; Noelle E Carlozzi; David Cella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Quality-of-life assessment in phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan K Reynolds; Terri L Levien
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerie Bridoux; Grégoire Moutel; Benoit Lefebure; Michel Scotte; Francis Michot; Christian Herve; Jean-Jacques Tuech
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Testing for differences in multiple quality of life dimensions: generating hypotheses from the experience of hospital staff.

Authors:  M Groenvold; P M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Sample sizes for randomized trials measuring quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  S A Julious; S George; D Machin; R J Stephens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Health-related quality of life after fast-track treatment results from a randomized controlled clinical equivalence trial.

Authors:  Ghislaine A P G van Mastrigt; Manuela A Joore; Fred H M Nieman; Johan L Severens; Jos G Maessen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Advising on Preferred Reporting Items for patient-reported outcome instrument development: the PRIPROID.

Authors:  Zheng-Kun Hou; Feng-Bin Liu; Ji-Qian Fang; Xiao-Ying Li; Li-Juan Li; Chu-Hua Lin
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 1.978

9.  Evaluation of quality of life in a clinical trial with nonrandom dropout: the effect of epoetin alfa in anemic cancer patients.

Authors:  D L Fairclough; D D Gagnon; M J Zagari; N Marschner; M Dicato
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Reporting and interpretation of SF-36 outcomes in randomised trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Despina G Contopoulos-Ioannidis; Anastasia Karvouni; Ioanna Kouri; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.