Literature DB >> 21954160

A method for inferring the rate of occurrence and fitness effects of advantageous mutations.

Adrian Schneider1, Brian Charlesworth, Adam Eyre-Walker, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

The distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations is of fundamental importance in evolutionary genetics. Recently, methods have been developed for inferring the DFE that use information from the allele frequency distributions of putatively neutral and selected nucleotide polymorphic variants in a population sample. Here, we extend an existing maximum-likelihood method that estimates the DFE under the assumption that mutational effects are unconditionally deleterious, by including a fraction of positively selected mutations. We allow one or more classes of positive selection coefficients in the model and estimate both the fraction of mutations that are advantageous and the strength of selection acting on them. We show by simulations that the method is capable of recovering the parameters of the DFE under a range of conditions. We apply the method to two data sets on multiple protein-coding genes from African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. We use a probabilistic reconstruction of the ancestral states of the polymorphic sites to distinguish between derived and ancestral states at polymorphic nucleotide sites. In both data sets, we see a significant improvement in the fit when a category of positively selected amino acid mutations is included, but no further improvement if additional categories are added. We estimate that between 1% and 2% of new nonsynonymous mutations in D. melanogaster are positively selected, with a scaled selection coefficient representing the product of the effective population size, N(e), and the strength of selection on heterozygous carriers of ∼2.5.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21954160      PMCID: PMC3241409          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.131730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  45 in total

1.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Context dependence, ancestral misidentification, and spurious signatures of natural selection.

Authors:  Ryan D Hernandez; Scott H Williamson; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Molecular population genomics: a short history.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  On the constancy of the evolutionary rate of cistrons.

Authors:  T Ota; M Kimura
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Confidence interval for the number of selectively neutral amino acid polymorphisms.

Authors:  S A Sawyer; D E Dykhuizen; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Estimating the genomewide rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  John J Welch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Joint inference of the distribution of fitness effects of deleterious mutations and population demography based on nucleotide polymorphism frequencies.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genome wide analyses reveal little evidence for adaptive evolution in many plant species.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Bao-Hua Song; Aaron J Windsor; Thomas Mitchell-Olds; Christopher J Dixon; Maxim V Kapralov; Dmitry A Filatov; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Pervasive adaptive protein evolution apparent in diversity patterns around amino acid substitutions in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Shmuel Sattath; Eyal Elyashiv; Oren Kolodny; Yosef Rinott; Guy Sella
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  63 in total

1.  Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution when the evolutionary divergence between species is small.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Evolutionary diversification of the multimeric states of proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Causes of natural variation in fitness: evidence from studies of Drosophila populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Charlesworth et al. on Background Selection and Neutral Diversity.

Authors:  Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Weak selection and protein evolution.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Naoki Osada; Tomoko Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Evidence for increased levels of positive and negative selection on the X chromosome versus autosomes in humans.

Authors:  Krishna R Veeramah; Ryan N Gutenkunst; August E Woerner; Joseph C Watkins; Michael F Hammer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Triallelic Population Genomics for Inferring Correlated Fitness Effects of Same Site Nonsynonymous Mutations.

Authors:  Aaron P Ragsdale; Alec J Coffman; PingHsun Hsieh; Travis J Struck; Ryan N Gutenkunst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

10.  Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Yuh Chwen G Lee; Charles H Langley; David J Begun
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.