Literature DB >> 24361994

Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.

Yuh Chwen G Lee1, Charles H Langley, David J Begun.   

Abstract

The long time scale of adaptive evolution makes it difficult to directly observe the spread of most beneficial mutations through natural populations. Therefore, inferring attributes of beneficial mutations by studying the genomic signals left by directional selection is an important component of population genetics research. One kind of signal is a trough in nearby neutral genetic variation due to selective fixation of initially rare alleles, a phenomenon known as "genetic hitchhiking." Accumulated evidence suggests that a considerable fraction of substitutions in the Drosophila genome results from positive selection, most of which are expected to have small selection coefficients and influence the population genetics of sites in the immediate vicinity. Using Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data, we found that the heterogeneity in synonymous polymorphism surrounding different categories of coding fixations is readily observable even within 25 bp of focal substitutions, which we interpret as the result of small-scale hitchhiking effects. The strength of natural selection on different sites appears to be quite heterogeneous. Particularly, neighboring fixations that changed amino acid polarities in a way that maintained the overall polarities of a protein were under stronger selection than other categories of fixations. Interestingly, we found that substitutions in slow-evolving genes are associated with stronger hitchhiking effects. This is consistent with the idea that adaptive evolution may involve few substitutions with large effects or many substitutions with small effects. Because our approach only weakly depends on the numbers of recent nonsynonymous substitutions, it can provide a complimentary view to the adaptive evolution inferred by other divergence-based evolutionary genetic methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; adaptive evolution; genetic hitchhiking; natural selection; natural variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24361994      PMCID: PMC4043186          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  92 in total

1.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation.

Authors:  H A Orr; A J Betancourt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Contribution of intra- and intermolecular hydrogen bonds to the conformational stability of human lysozyme(,).

Authors:  K Takano; Y Yamagata; J Funahashi; Y Hioki; S Kuramitsu; K Yutani
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis.

Authors:  W R Atchley; K R Wollenberg; W M Fitch; W Terhalle; A W Dress
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 4.  Polar group burial contributes more to protein stability than nonpolar group burial.

Authors:  C N Pace
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation.

Authors:  Y Kim; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  J C Fay; C I Wu
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Adaptive hitchhiking effects on genome variability.

Authors:  P Andolfatto
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  Selection intensity against deleterious mutations in RNA secondary structures and rate of compensatory nucleotide substitutions.

Authors:  H Innan; W Stephan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population.

Authors:  N Takahata; K Ishii; H Matsuda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila.

Authors:  G A McVean; J Vieira
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  7 in total

1.  Natural Selection and Genetic Diversity in the Butterfly Heliconius melpomene.

Authors:  Simon H Martin; Markus Möst; William J Palmer; Camilo Salazar; W Owen McMillan; Francis M Jiggins; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Natural Selection in the Great Apes.

Authors:  Alexander Cagan; Christoph Theunert; Hafid Laayouni; Gabriel Santpere; Marc Pybus; Ferran Casals; Kay Prüfer; Arcadi Navarro; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Jaume Bertranpetit; Aida M Andrés
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  A Genomic Map of the Effects of Linked Selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  Eyal Elyashiv; Shmuel Sattath; Tina T Hu; Alon Strutsovsky; Graham McVicker; Peter Andolfatto; Graham Coop; Guy Sella
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Genome-wide signals of positive selection in strongylocentrotid sea urchins.

Authors:  Kord M Kober; Grant H Pogson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Andrew D Kern
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Background selection as baseline for nucleotide variation across the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Josep M Comeron
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Signatures of natural selection in abiotic stress-responsive genes of Solanum chilense.

Authors:  Katharina B Böndel; Tetyana Nosenko; Wolfgang Stephan
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.963

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.