Eva Guérin1. 1. Department of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Given trends toward studying positive mental health in the behavioral sciences, the concepts of vitality, well-being, and quality of life (QoL) have received significant attention. Unfortunately, interpreting their empirical findings and applications is difficult given a tendency to use these terms synonymously and/or without clear apriori definitions. METHODS: This review presents an in-depth, critical examination of vitality, well-being, and QoL (especially health-related QoL) while paying particular attention to their similarities and differences. Given the proliferation of studies in the area of physical activity psychology, this review draws from a collection of knowledge in the physical activity domain to provide readers with concrete examples and to support arguments that are raised. RESULTS: The narrative content is divided into 3 sections with critical appraisals of each: definitions and meaning, theoretical views, and research, the latter of which is further subdivided into measurement and findings. Several parallels and discrepancies between the constructs are brought forward. CONCLUSIONS: Important arguments, among others, include the precision or specificity of the definition of vitality compared with well-being and QoL, and the emergence of a spectrum along which these constructs can be aligned with regards to the breadth of internal and external experiences they capture.
BACKGROUND: Given trends toward studying positive mental health in the behavioral sciences, the concepts of vitality, well-being, and quality of life (QoL) have received significant attention. Unfortunately, interpreting their empirical findings and applications is difficult given a tendency to use these terms synonymously and/or without clear apriori definitions. METHODS: This review presents an in-depth, critical examination of vitality, well-being, and QoL (especially health-related QoL) while paying particular attention to their similarities and differences. Given the proliferation of studies in the area of physical activity psychology, this review draws from a collection of knowledge in the physical activity domain to provide readers with concrete examples and to support arguments that are raised. RESULTS: The narrative content is divided into 3 sections with critical appraisals of each: definitions and meaning, theoretical views, and research, the latter of which is further subdivided into measurement and findings. Several parallels and discrepancies between the constructs are brought forward. CONCLUSIONS: Important arguments, among others, include the precision or specificity of the definition of vitality compared with well-being and QoL, and the emergence of a spectrum along which these constructs can be aligned with regards to the breadth of internal and external experiences they capture.
Authors: Jennifer E Flythe; Tandrea S Hilliard; Kourtney Ikeler; San Keller; Debbie S Gipson; Amanda C Grandinetti; Robert J Nordyke; Ronald D Perrone; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Mark Unruh; Melissa West; Fraser Bocell; Frank P Hurst Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: D L Katz; M C Karlsen; M Chung; M M Shams-White; L W Green; J Fielding; A Saito; W Willett Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Sabrina K Schmidt; Michael S Reinboth; Geir K Resaland; Solfrid Bratland-Sanda Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ida Damen; Hans Brombacher; Carine Lallemand; Rens Brankaert; Aarnout Brombacher; Pieter van Wesemael; Steven Vos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.390