| Literature DB >> 27854227 |
Elaine Walklet1,2, Kate Muse2, Jane Meyrick1, Tim Moss1.
Abstract
Quality of life and well-being are frequently restricted in adults with <span class="Disease">neuromuscular disorders. As such, identification of appropriate interventions is imperative. The objective of this paper was to systematically review and <span class="Disease">critically appraise quantitative studies (RCTs, controlled trials and cohort studies) of psychosocial interventions designed to improve quality of life and well-being in adults with neuromuscular disorders. A systematic review of the published and unpublished literature was conducted. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were appraised using a validated quality assessment tool and results presented in a narrative synthesis. Out of 3,136 studies identified, ten studies met criteria for inclusion within the review. Included studies comprised a range of interventions including: cognitive behavioural therapy, dignity therapy, hypnosis, expressive disclosure, gratitude lists, group psychoeducation and psychologically informed rehabilitation. Five of the interventions were for patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). The remainder were for patients with post-polio syndrome, muscular dystrophies and mixed disorders, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, myasthenia gravis and myotonic dystrophy. Across varied interventions and neuromuscular disorders, seven studies reported a short-term beneficial effect of intervention on quality of life and well-being. Whilst such findings are encouraging, widespread issues with the methodological quality of these studies significantly compromised the results. There is no strong evidence that psychosocial interventions improve quality of life and well-being in adults with neuromuscular disorders, due to a paucity of high quality research in this field. Multi-site, randomised controlled trials with active controls, standardised outcome measurement and longer term follow-ups are urgently required.Entities:
Keywords: Neuromuscular diseases; adult; psychology; quality of life; review
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27854227 PMCID: PMC5123628 DOI: 10.3233/JND-160155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuromuscul Dis
Fig.1Flow diagram of study selection process.
Intervention details and summary outcomes for included studies
| Study | Study | NMD(s) | Total | Psychosocial | Content, context & | Duration | Control | QOL/well-being | Main findings for QOL |
| design | ( | condition | Intervention | delivery | outcome: Measure(s) | and/or well-being | |||
| [ | RCT | ALS ( | Int: ( | Expressive disclosure | P’s asked to write or talk about the deepest feelings about their condition at home. | 20 mins writing/ talking for 3 days over 1 week | No intervention | PWB: Composite score derived from measure of QOL, affect, depression &spirituality | Significant increase in PWB in intervention group from baseline to 3 months but not maintained at 6 months. Significant decrease in PWB in control group from baseline to 3 months, not at 6 months. |
| [ | RCT | PPS (+ severe fatigue) ( | Int: ( | CBT | Face to face CBT tailored to fatigue in NMD delivered by CBT therapists in outpatient clinics using standard modules. Individual or with partner. | 0 – 12 ( | Usual care | HRQoL: SF-36 | No significant difference in HRQol at baseline, end of intervention, 3 &6 month follow-up compared to control. |
| [ | RCT | ALS ( | Int: ( | CBT | Face to face CBT tailored to adjustment &coping delivered by trained psychologists in outpatient clinics using standard modules. Individual or with partner. | 5 – 10 1×hour sessions delivered over 16 weeks | Usual care | Mental QOL: SF-36-MCS &ALSAQ-40-EF (subscales) | QOL measured by ALSAQ-40-EF deteriorated less in the CBT group than control from baseline to 6 months. No significant change in SF-36-MCS. |
| [ | CAT | MD: | Int: ( | Comprehensive rehabilitation | Individual and group sessions for patients and next of kin tailored to biopsychosocial needs. Delivered by counsellors, Occupational Therapists, Physiotherapists, neurologist &nurse in hospital. | 4 sessions delivered in 10 days over 18 month period | Usual care | QOL*: SIP (HRQoL), PWBQ (PWB) &HADS (Mood) | No significant change in HRQol, PWB or mood from pre to immediately post intervention. Control group deteriorated significantly on physical index of HRQol. |
| MTD ( | *NB QOL assessed as a ‘multi-dimensional concept’ | ||||||||
| FSHD ( | |||||||||
| BD ( | |||||||||
| LGD ( | |||||||||
| ED ( | |||||||||
| HDM ( | |||||||||
| PD ( | |||||||||
| [ | CAT | Mixed: PPS ( | Int: ( | Gratitude intervention | P’s wrote daily gratitude lists at home of up to 5 things grateful/ thankful for &completed daily experience ratings. | Daily writing for 21 days | No intervention | SWB: Author developed scale. Observer reported well-being: SWLS &author developed affect scale | Significantly higher SWB in intervention group than control across 21 day intervention period. Observer ratings significantly higher for life satisfaction and positive affect in gratitude condition, no differences for negative affect. |
| [ | CAT | ALS ( | Int: ( | Hypnosis-based psychodynamic treatment | Hypnosis sessions delivered at home by a trained practitioner in 4 themes: safe place, awareness, life chain and perceptive. Self-hypnosis also encouraged. | 4×weekly 1-1 ¼ hour sessions (+ self-hypnosis) | No intervention | HRQOL: ALSSQOL-r | Total HRQol and most subscales improved pre to post intervention &3 months; not maintained at 6 months. |
| [ | CAT | Mixed:MG ( | Int: ( | Group video-conference online CBT | NMD tailored CBT sessions delivered via Skype by a Psychologist in groups of 4-5 p’s. | 7×1 hour sessions every 2 weeks | No intervention | HRQoL: WHO-DAS II, SF-36 &SIP | Pre intervention to 4.5 months later, CBT group significantly improved on total WHO-DAS II and all domains except self-care; total SIP and all subscales except mobility and SF-36 general health. |
| [ | Cohort | ALS ( | Int: | Dignity Therapy | Dignity Therapy delivered by a psychologist for patients &caregivers at home. | Delivered in 3–7 visits (approx. 8 hours) over 14–113 days ( | No control | HRQoL: ALSAQ-5. Spiritual WB: FACIT-sp 12 | No significant change in HrQol or spiritual well-being from pre to 1 week post intervention. |
| [ | Cohort | Mixed:+ severe fatigue PN ( | Int: Total ( | Fatigue management group | Interactive small group educational sessions + homework on managing and coping with fatigue. Delivered by Occupational Therapist, Physiotherapist &Social Worker at rehab clinic. | 5 weekly 2×hour sessions + 3 month follow-up session. | No control | HRQoL: SF-36 | Significant improvements in SF-36 subscales role-physical, mental health and general health perceptions from baseline to 3 months post-intervention. Greater improvements in males and p’s with lower education levels &lower baseline self-efficacy. |
| [ | Cohort | ALS ( | Int: ( | Hypnosis-based intervention | Hypnosis-based intervention administered at home by a Psychologist (+ self- hypnosis). Related to issues such as illness acceptance &resilience. | 4×weekly 45 min sessions (+ self hypnosis) | No control | HRQoL: ALSAQ-5, ALSSQOL-r | Significant improvements pre to immediately post intervention in ALSQOL-r total and subscales: religiosity and negative emotion. No significant change in ALSAQ-5. |
Abbreviations for conditions: ALS = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; BD = Becker Dystrophy; CA = Cerebellar Ataxia; CMT = Charcot Marie Tooth Disease; ED = Emery-Dreifuss Dystrophy; FSHD = Facioscapuolohumeral Dystrophy; HDM = Hereditary Distal Myopathy; HSP = Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis; KD = Kennedy Disease; LGD = Limb-Girdle Dystrophy; MD = Muscular Dystrophy; MND = Motor Neuron Disease; MS = Multiple Sclerosis; MTD = Myotonic Dystrophy; NMD = Neuromuscular disorder; PD = Proximal Dystrophy; PPS = Post-Polio Syndrome; PN = Polyneuropathy; SPA = Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Abbreviations for measures: ALSAQ-5; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire-5 [43]; ALSAQ-40 = Emotional Functioning subscale of ALS Assessment Questionnaire [51]; ALSSQOL-r = Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Specific Quality of Life – revised [52]; FACIT-sp 12 = Spiritual Well-being Scale of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [53]; HADS = The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [54]; PWBQ = The Psychosocial Well-being Questionnaire [55]; SF-36 = The Medical Outcome Study Short Form Health Survey [42]; SF-36 – MCS = Health Survey Short Form, Mental Component Summary; SIP = Sickness Impact Profile [44]; SWLS = Satisfaction with Life Scale [56]; WHO-DAS II = World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II [57]. Additional abbreviations: Con = Control group; CAT = Cohort Analytic Trial; CBT = Cognitive Behavioural Therapy; HRQoL = Health–related quality of life; Int = intervention group; M = Mean; n = number; NS = not specified; p = participant; PWB = Psychological Well-being; QOL = Quality of life; RCT = Randomised Controlled Trial; SWB = Subjective Well-being; WB = Well-being.
Quality appraisal of all included studies
| Study | Selection | Study | Confounds | Blinding | Data | Withdrawals/ | Global | Additional |
| Bias | Design | Collection | Dropouts | rating | Notes | |||
| [ | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | A small number of the control group were also receiving rehabilitation. No intervention protocol provided. Quality and consistency of intervention not measured. |
| [ | Weak | Moderate | N/A | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Weak | No control group. Detailed protocol for intervention provided and sessions recorded but not rated for quality and adherence. |
| [ | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Selective outcome reporting. Standardised instructions provided but adherence to intervention not measured. |
| [ | Weak | Moderate | N/A | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | No control group. Content of intervention described but no method of checking quality and adherence. |
| [ | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Standardised instructions provided. Manipulation check confirmed gratitude condition elicited greater expressions of gratitude than control. Mean outcomes across intervention period calculated for analyses. |
| [ | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Small sample. Intervention protocol but no method of checking quality and adherence. 5 intervention participants were also receiving psychopharmacology |
| [ | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Small sample. Standardised CBT modules utilised and selected via criteria. Quality and adherence not assessed. Co-interventions received in control and treatment groups. |
| [ | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Strong | Weak | Weak | Participants assigned to control group if they did not have access to a computer/webcam. Detailed protocol for intervention provided but no method of checking quality and adherence. Significant baseline differences in quality of life not controlled in analysis. |
| [ | Weak | Weak | N/A | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Weak | No control group. Small sample size. Intervention protocol but no method of checking quality and adherence described. |
| [ | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Small sample. Standardised CBT module utilised but no method of checking quality and adherence. Trial stopped prematurely due to slow recruitment and missing data. |
Note: Global quality ratings were calculated from component ratings in accordance with criteria specified in the EPHPP tool. Global rating ‘weak’ = 2 + weak component ratings; global quality rating ‘moderate’ = 1 weak component rating; global quality rating ‘strong’ = no weak component ratings. See http://www.ephpp.ca/PDF/Quality%20Assessment%20Tool_2010_2.pdf.
A comparison of intervention factors within included studies
| Study | Theoretical | Protocol/ | Delivered by | Provides | Targets | Targets | Targets | Targets | Facilitates |
| basis | Manual | Psychologist | psycho-education | emotional | relaxation | cognitions | behaviours | social | |
| specified | expression | support | |||||||
| [ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| [ | X | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | X | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| [ | X | X | X | ✓ | X | X | X | ✓ | ✓ |
| [ | X | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | X | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | X | X | X |
| [ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| [ | X | ✓ | ✓ | X | ✓ | X | X | X | X |
| [ | X | ✓ | X | X | X | X | ✓ | ✓ | |
| [ | X | ✓ | ✓ | X | X | ✓ | X | X | X |
= No significant effects of intervention on quality of life and/or well-being. Note: Intervention factors were derived from variables within included studies.