Literature DB >> 21951229

Transcatheter heart valve with variable geometric configuration: in vitro evaluation.

Ernest Young1, Ji-Feng Chen, Owen Dong, Shengqiang Gao, Alex Massiello, Kiyotaka Fukamachi.   

Abstract

Clinically, the current transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) technology has shown a propensity for paravalvular leakage; studies have correlated this flaw to increased calcification at the implantation site and with nonideal geometry of the stented valve. The present study evaluated the hydrodynamics of different geometric configurations, in particular the intravalvular considerations. Three TAV devices were made to create a representative, size 26 mm TAV. Hydrodynamics were assessed using a pulse duplicator. The geometries tested were composed of the nominal, elliptical, triangular, and undersized shapes; along with half-constriction, a conformation in which only a portion of the stent was constrained. The TAVs were assessed for transvalvular pressure gradient (TVG), effective orifice area (EOA), and regurgitant fraction. The nominal-sized shape posed a larger TVG (6.2 ± 0.3 mm Hg) than other configurations (P < 0.001) except the undersized valves. EOA of the nominal sized TAV (1.7 ± 0.1 cm(2) ) was smaller than that of the triangular and half-elliptical versions (P < 0.001). The half- and full-undersized geometries had EOAs smaller than the nominal type (P < 0.001). Nominal shape had smaller regurgitation (6.7 ± 1.4%) than all configurations (P < 0.001) except for the half-undersized (4.0 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference from the full-undersized (6.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.724). The testing of variable geometries showed significant differences from the nominal geometry with respect to TVG, EOA, and regurgitant fraction. In particular, many of these nonideal configurations demonstrated an increased intravalvular regurgitation.
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Artificial Organs © 2011, International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21951229     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01331.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  6 in total

Review 1.  On the Mechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Lakshmi P Dasi; Hoda Hatoum; Arash Kheradvar; Ramin Zareian; S Hamed Alavi; Wei Sun; Caitlin Martin; Thuy Pham; Qian Wang; Prem A Midha; Vrishank Raghav; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Effect of Arched Leaflets and Stent Profile on the Hemodynamics of Tri-Leaflet Flexible Polymeric Heart Valves.

Authors:  Atieh Yousefi; David L Bark; Lakshmi P Dasi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Simulated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Flow: Implications of Elliptical Deployment and Under-Expansion at the Aortic Annulus.

Authors:  Eric Sirois; Wenbin Mao; Kewei Li; Joseph Calderan; Wei Sun
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.094

4.  Total ellipse of the heart valve: the impact of eccentric stent distortion on the regional dynamic deformation of pericardial tissue leaflets of a transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Paul S Gunning; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Ajit P Yoganathan; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Simulating Radial Pressure Waveforms with a Mock Circulatory Flow Loop to Characterize Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Anna Packy; Gavin A D'Souza; Masoud Farahmand; Luke Herbertson; Christopher G Scully
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.305

6.  Impact of different aortic valve calcification patterns on the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A finite element study.

Authors:  Francesco Sturla; Mattia Ronzoni; Mattia Vitali; Annalisa Dimasi; Riccardo Vismara; Georgia Preston-Maher; Gaetano Burriesci; Emiliano Votta; Alberto Redaelli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.712

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.