Literature DB >> 29608034

Simulated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Flow: Implications of Elliptical Deployment and Under-Expansion at the Aortic Annulus.

Eric Sirois1, Wenbin Mao2, Kewei Li1, Joseph Calderan1, Wei Sun1,2.   

Abstract

Clinical use of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) has been associated with abnormal deployment, including oval deployment and under-expansion when placed into calcified aortic annuli. In this study, we performed an integrated computational and experimental investigation to quantify the impact of abnormal deployment at the aortic annulus on TAV hemodynamics. A size 23 mm generic TAV computational model, developed and published previously, was subjected to elliptical deployment at the annulus with eccentricity levels up to 0.68 and to under-expansion of the TAV at the annulus by up to 25%. The hemodynamic performance was quantified for each TAV deployment configuration. TAV opening geometries were fabricated using stereolithography and then subjected to steady forward flow testing in accordance with ISO-5840. Centerline pressure profiles were compared to validate the computational model. Our findings show that slight ellipticity of the TAV may not lead to degeneration of hydrodynamic performance. However, under large ellipticity, increases in transvalvular pressure gradients were observed. Under-expanded deployment has a much greater negative effect on the TAV hemodynamics compared with elliptical deployment. The maximum turbulent viscous shear stress (TVSS) values were found to be significantly larger in under-expanded TAVs. Although the maximum value of TVSS was not large enough to cause hemolysis in all cases, it may cause platelets activation, especially for under-expanded deployments.
© 2018 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  -Computational simulation; -Elliptical valve deployment; -Hemodynamics; -Replacement; Transcatheter aortic valve

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29608034      PMCID: PMC6097918          DOI: 10.1111/aor.13107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  46 in total

1.  A discussion on the threshold limit for hemolysis related to Reynolds shear stress.

Authors:  M Grigioni; C Daniele; G D'Avenio; V Barbaro
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Simulated elliptical bioprosthetic valve deformation: implications for asymmetric transcatheter valve deployment.

Authors:  Wei Sun; Kewei Li; Eric Sirois
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Hemodynamics of the Edwards Sapien XT transcatheter heart valve in noncircular aortic annuli.

Authors:  Michael Scharfschwerdt; Roza Meyer-Saraei; Claudia Schmidtke; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid anatomy.

Authors:  Zhen-Gang Zhao; Hasan Jilaihawi; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  In vitro assessment of the influence of aortic annulus ovality on the hydrodynamic performance of self-expanding transcatheter heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  Maximilian Kuetting; Alexander Sedaghat; Marc Utzenrath; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Schmitz; Jan Roggenkamp; Nikos Werner; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Ulrich Steinseifer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.

Authors:  Wenbin Mao; Kewei Li; Wei Sun
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.495

8.  Simulation of long-term fatigue damage in bioprosthetic heart valves: effects of leaflet and stent elastic properties.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Wei Sun
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-10-04

Review 9.  Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alan Zajarias; Alain G Cribier
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Bioprosthetic Valve Thrombosis Versus Structural Failure: Clinical and Echocardiographic Predictors.

Authors:  Alexander C Egbe; Sorin V Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Joseph T Poterucha; Hartzell V Schaff; Joseph J Maleszewski; Heidi M Connolly
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing.

Authors:  Oren M Rotman; Matteo Bianchi; Ram P Ghosh; Brandon Kovarovic; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.166

2.  An in vitro evaluation of turbulence after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Hoda Hatoum; Atieh Yousefi; Scott Lilly; Pablo Maureira; Juan Crestanello; Lakshmi P Dasi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Validation of methods for effective orifice area measurement of prosthetic valves by two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography following transcatheter self-expanding aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ming-Hu Xiao; Yong-Jian Wu; Jing-Jin Wang; Guang-Yuan Song; Jian-De Wang; Zhen-Hui Zhu; Xu Wang; Zhen-Yan Zhao; Hao Wang
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.327

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.