Osman Kupik1, Yavuz Metin2, Gülnihan Eren3, Nurgul Orhan Metin4, Medeni Arpa5. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey. 2. Department of Radiology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey. 4. Department of Radiology, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey. 5. Department of Biochemistry, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University School of Medicine, Rize, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether there is a correlation between dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DESCT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters in primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. METHODS: Primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes of 68 patients diagnosed with lung cancer were evaluated retrospectively with 18F-FDG PET/CT and DESCT imaging. The histologic subtypes were adenocarcinoma (n=29), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n=26), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=11), and large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) (n=2). In terms of PET parameters, SUVmax, SUVmean, SULmax, SULmean, SULpeak, and normalized SUL values were obtained for primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In terms of DESCT parameters, maximum and mean iodine content (IC), normalized IC values, iodine enhancement (IE) and normalized IE values were calculated. RESULTS: We found no correlation between DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In addition, no correlation was found in the analysis performed in any of the histologic subgroups. In patients with a primary tumor <3 cm, there was a moderate negative correlation between the parameters SUVmax-ICmax (r= -0.456, p = 0.043), SUVmean-ICmax (r= -0.464, p = 0.039) SULmean-ICmax (r= -0.497, p = 0.026), SUVmax-ICmean (r= -0.527, p = 0.020), SULmean-ICmean (r= -0.499, p = 0.025), and SULpeak-ICmean (r= -0.488, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: We consider that DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT indicate different characteristics of the tumors and should not supersede each other.
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate whether there is a correlation between dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DESCT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters in primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer. METHODS:Primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes of 68 patients diagnosed with lung cancer were evaluated retrospectively with 18F-FDG PET/CT and DESCT imaging. The histologic subtypes were adenocarcinoma (n=29), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (n=26), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n=11), and large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) (n=2). In terms of PET parameters, SUVmax, SUVmean, SULmax, SULmean, SULpeak, and normalized SUL values were obtained for primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In terms of DESCT parameters, maximum and mean iodine content (IC), normalized IC values, iodine enhancement (IE) and normalized IE values were calculated. RESULTS: We found no correlation between DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes. In addition, no correlation was found in the analysis performed in any of the histologic subgroups. In patients with a primary tumor <3 cm, there was a moderate negative correlation between the parameters SUVmax-ICmax (r= -0.456, p = 0.043), SUVmean-ICmax (r= -0.464, p = 0.039) SULmean-ICmax (r= -0.497, p = 0.026), SUVmax-ICmean (r= -0.527, p = 0.020), SULmean-ICmean (r= -0.499, p = 0.025), and SULpeak-ICmean (r= -0.488, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: We consider that DESCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT indicate different characteristics of the tumors and should not supersede each other.
Authors: Ji Ye Son; Ho Yun Lee; Jae-Hun Kim; Joungho Han; Ji Yun Jeong; Kyung Soo Lee; O Jung Kwon; Young Mog Shim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-05-17 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lisa K Dunnwald; Julie R Gralow; Georgiana K Ellis; Robert B Livingston; Hannah M Linden; Jennifer M Specht; Robert K Doot; Thomas J Lawton; William E Barlow; Brenda F Kurland; Erin K Schubert; David A Mankoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bhavik N Patel; Federica Vernuccio; Mathias Meyer; Benjamin Godwin; Michael Rosenberg; Nicholas Rudnick; Scott Harring; Rendon Nelson; Juan Carlos Ramirez-Giraldo; Alfredo Farjat; Daniele Marin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Brun Andersen; Aska Drljevic-Nielsen; Jesper Thygesen; Matthijs Ferdinand Kruis; Karin Hjorthaug; Finn Rasmussen; Jasper Albertus Nijkamp Journal: Tomography Date: 2022-07-08