Literature DB >> 21946326

Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Hadas Lapid1, Sagit Shushan, Anton Plotkin, Hillary Voet, Yehudah Roth, Thomas Hummel, Elad Schneidman, Noam Sobel.   

Abstract

Organization of receptive surfaces reflects primary axes of perception. In vision, retinal coordinates reflect spatial coordinates. In audition, cochlear coordinates reflect tonal coordinates. However, the rules underlying the organization of the olfactory receptive surface are unknown. To test the hypothesis that organization of the olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception, we inserted an electrode into the human olfactory epithelium to directly measure odorant-induced evoked responses. We found that pairwise differences in odorant pleasantness predicted pairwise differences in response magnitude; that is, a location that responded maximally to a pleasant odorant was likely to respond strongly to other pleasant odorants, and a location that responded maximally to an unpleasant odorant was likely to respond strongly to other unpleasant odorants. Moreover, the extent of an individual's perceptual span predicted their span in evoked response. This suggests that, similarly to receptor surfaces for vision and audition, organization of the olfactory receptor surface reflects key axes of perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21946326     DOI: 10.1038/nn.2926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  45 in total

1.  Mucosal activity patterns as a basis for olfactory discrimination: comparing behavior and optical recordings.

Authors:  P F Kent; M M Mozell; S L Youngentob; P Yurco
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Neural map formation in the mouse olfactory system.

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakano
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Odorant removal from the frog olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  D E Hornung; M M Mozell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-06-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Regional distribution of rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  P I Ezeh; L M Davis; J W Scott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Recording of the human electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  M Knecht; T Hummel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-10-30

Review 6.  An odor is not worth a thousand words: from multidimensional odors to unidimensional odor objects.

Authors:  Yaara Yeshurun; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  The nose smells what the eye sees: crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Interindividual variability in nasal filtration as a function of nasal cavity geometry.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Earl W Tewksbury; Brian A Wong; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.849

9.  Natural selection on the olfactory receptor gene family in humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Yoav Gilad; Carlos D Bustamante; Doron Lancet; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Principles of glomerular organization in the human olfactory bulb--implications for odor processing.

Authors:  Alison Maresh; Diego Rodriguez Gil; Mary C Whitman; Charles A Greer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  27 in total

1.  An axis of good and awful in odor reception.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  The muted sense: neurocognitive limitations of olfactory language.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Odorant similarity in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Adi Yablonka; Noam Sobel; Rafi Haddad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.

Authors:  Ophelia Deroy; Anne-Sylvie Crisinel; Charles Spence
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

5.  Topographical representation of odor hedonics in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Florence Kermen; Maëllie Midroit; Nicola Kuczewski; Jérémy Forest; Marc Thévenet; Joëlle Sacquet; Claire Benetollo; Marion Richard; Anne Didier; Nathalie Mandairon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Olfaction as a marker for depression.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Properties of an optogenetic model for olfactory stimulation.

Authors:  Federica Genovese; Marion Thews; Frank Möhrlen; Stephan Frings
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Theta Oscillations Rapidly Convey Odor-Specific Content in Human Piriform Cortex.

Authors:  Heidi Jiang; Stephan Schuele; Joshua Rosenow; Christina Zelano; Josef Parvizi; James X Tao; Shasha Wu; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Effects of 20 mg oral Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol on the olfactory function of healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Bruno G Oertel; Dagmar Ludyga; Alfred Ultsch; Thomas Hummel; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Modality general and modality specific coding of hedonic valence.

Authors:  V Miskovic; A K Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.