Literature DB >> 7666133

Regional distribution of rat electroolfactogram.

P I Ezeh1, L M Davis, J W Scott.   

Abstract

1. Electroolfactorgram (EOG) recordings were made from different regions of the rat olfactory epithelium to test for spatial distribution of odor responses. 2. The EOG recordings showed spatial distribution of the odor responses in the olfactory epithelium. While some odorants (amyl acetate, anisole, and ethyl butyrate) were more effective in evoking responses in the dorsal recess near the septum, other odorants (including limonene, cineole, cyclooctane, and hexane) were more effective in the lateral recesses among the turbinate bones. These differences were seen as statistically significant odorant-by-position interactions in analysis of variance. 3. Comparisons of recordings along the anteroposterior dimension of the epithelium produced smaller differences between the odor responses. These were not significant for 3-mm distances, but were statistically significant for 5- to 6-mm distances along the dorsomedial epithelium. 4. The latencies were significantly longer in the lateral recesses than in the medial region. This probably reflects a more tortuous air path along the turbinate bones to the lateral recesses. 5. The olfactory receptor cells were activated by antidromic stimulation via the nerve layer of the olfactory bulb. The population spikes evoked from the olfactory receptor cells could be suppressed by prior stimulation with odorants that evoked strong EOG responses. This collision of the antidromic action potentials with the odor-evoked action potentials indicates that the same population of receptor cells was activated in both cases. 6. The flow rate and duration of the artificial sniff were varied systematically in some experiments. The differential distribution of response sizes was present at all flow rates and sniff durations. Some odors (e.g., amyl acetate and anisole) produced increased responses in the epithelium of the lateral recesses when flow rates or sniff durations were high. We suggest that these changes may reflect the sorptive properties of the nasal membranes on these odors. The responses to other odors (e.g., hexane or limonene) were not greatly affected by flow rate or sniff duration. 7. Taken with existing anatomic data, the results indicate that the primary olfactory neurons that project axons to glomeruli in different parts of the olfactory bulb are responsive to different odors. The latency differences between responses at medial and lateral sites are large enough to be physiologically significant in the generation of the patterned responses of olfactory bulb neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7666133     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  16 in total

1.  Chemical determinants of the rat electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  J W Scott; T Brierley; F H Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Zonal organization of the mammalian main and accessory olfactory systems.

Authors:  K Mori; H von Campenhause; Y Yoshihara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Functional organization of sensory input to the olfactory bulb glomerulus analyzed by two-photon calcium imaging.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak; Winfried Denk; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Authors:  Hadas Lapid; Sagit Shushan; Anton Plotkin; Hillary Voet; Yehudah Roth; Thomas Hummel; Elad Schneidman; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  OCAM: A new member of the neural cell adhesion molecule family related to zone-to-zone projection of olfactory and vomeronasal axons.

Authors:  Y Yoshihara; M Kawasaki; A Tamada; H Fujita; H Hayashi; H Kagamiyama; K Mori
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Coding odorant concentration through activation timing between the medial and lateral olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Zhishang Zhou; Leonardo Belluscio
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Effects of odor stimulation on antidromic spikes in olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.