Literature DB >> 10347987

Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis.

E S Draper1, J J Kurinczuk, K R Abrams, M Clarke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have described the perinatal risks associated with infertility, other than for infertility treated by in-vitro fertilisation or gamete intrafallopian transfer. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the risks of perinatal death associated with treated and untreated infertility.
METHODS: A population-based case-control study of perinatal deaths was carried out in Leicestershire Health District over the period 1990-94, during which 60,922 babies were delivered. Of these, 567 perinatal deaths were associated with 542 women. 972 mothers were randomly selected as controls. Medical, obstetric, and social data were collected for cases and controls from the medical notes and interviews with the women. The relative risks of perinatal death associated with treated and untreated infertility before the index pregnancy were estimated as odds ratios by means of unconditional logistic regression analysis.
FINDINGS: 65 (10%) of cases and 34 (3.5%) of the controls had infertility before the index pregnancy. History of infertility in the index pregnancy, irrespective of treatment, increased the risk of perinatal death (odds ratio 2.9 [95% CI 1.8-4.5]). The population attributable risk fraction for perinatal death related to infertility was 6.2% (3.4-9.0). 45 (54%) of the deaths, even in the untreated group, were associated with immaturity. Compared with women without infertility, women with untreated infertility were at increased risk of perinatal death (3.3 [1.6-6.8]). The risk of perinatal death associated with multiple births did not explain this finding. Similarly, treated infertility also increased the risk of perinatal death (2.7 [1.5-4.7]); the risks associated with multiple births explained some, but not all, of this excess. In Leicestershire, the overall underlying risk of a mother experiencing at least one perinatal death over the study was 9.0 per 1000 women. For women who experience infertility, this risk increases by about 18 per 1000 (6-30).
INTERPRETATION: Counselling for women before any form of infertility treatment should include discussion of the risks of perinatal death. Our results would benefit from confirmation. However, we advocate that at antenatal booking a history of infertility, irrespective of treatment, should be sought, because these women have a significantly increased risk of perinatal death, particularly associated with prematurity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10347987     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08500-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  21 in total

1.  Teenage pregnancy is not a public health problem.

Authors:  D Lawlor; M Shaw; S Johns
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-12-15

2.  Congenital anomalies after treatment for infertility.

Authors:  Soo-Mi Park; Raj Mathur; Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-30

3.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Infertility, infertility treatment, and fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  Jin Liang Zhu; Carsten Obel; Bodil Hammer Bech; Jørn Olsen; Olga Basso
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Paternal age and mortality in children.

Authors:  Jin Liang Zhu; Mogens Vestergaard; Kreesten M Madsen; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  A meta-analysis of the impact of IVF and ICSI on major malformations after adjusting for the effect of subfertility.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Public health implications of a North American publicly funded in vitro fertilization program; lessons to learn.

Authors:  Talya Shaulov; Serge Belisle; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  An epigenetic association of malformations, adverse reproductive outcomes, and fetal origins hypothesis related effects.

Authors:  Mark Lubinsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Smaller fetal size in singletons after infertility therapies: the influence of technology and the underlying infertility.

Authors:  Amber R Cooper; Kathleen E O'Neill; Jenifer E Allsworth; Emily S Jungheim; Anthony O Odibo; Diana L Gray; Valerie S Ratts; Kelle H Moley; Randall R Odem
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.