Literature DB >> 21938581

Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing?

Sharon Stein1, Jonah Stulberg, Bradley Champagne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to perform a laparoscopic colectomy is an integral part of a young colorectal surgeon's practice. However, the number of resections required during colorectal residency for a surgeon to be very comfortable performing a laparoscopic colectomy independently is poorly defined. Furthermore, the percentage of trainees that achieve this goal also is unknown.
METHODS: An electronic survey designed by the Young Surgeon's Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) was sent to graduates completing Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) colorectal residencies after publication of the Clinical Outcomes Study Group (COST) trial (2004-2009). The data collected included the number of laparoscopic right (LR), laparoscopic left (LL), and laparoscopic hand-assisted left (HAL) colectomies performed during residency. Trainees were asked to assess whether at the completion of their fellowship they with each case were very comfortable (VC, would perform a laparoscopic colectomy independently), somewhat comfortable (SC, would require assistance from colleagues), or not comfortable (NC, would not perform a laparoscopic colectomy).
RESULTS: Of the 176 (51%) former fellows responding to the survey, 42 (24%) reported performing fewer than 10 LRs, 108 (62%) reported 10 to 30 LRs, and 24 (14%) reported more than 30 LRs during their fellowship. With LR, 13 (7.5%) respondents were NC, 42 (21%) were SC, and 119 (68%) were VC. As reported, 58 fellows (33%) performed fewer than 10 LLs, 92 (53%) performed 10-30 LLs, and 22 (13%) performed more than 30 LLs. With LL, 12.2% were NC, 33.7% were SC, and 54.1% were VC. Most of the fellows (90%) who performed 30 or more LR, LL, or HAL colectomies were VC. On the average, each year's graduating fellows were more comfortable with laparoscopic colectomy than those graduating in previous years (P < 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Performing more than 10 LR colectomies and more than 30 LL colectomies provided the vast majority of colorectal residents with the ability to be very comfortable with these procedures as they entered practice. A concerning number of trainees (46% of LL and 24% of LR trainees) did not reach this benchmark. The new general minimal American Board of Colon and Rectal Surgery (ABCRS) requirement of 50 laparoscopic resections seems appropriate but may require definition regarding the side of the procedure.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21938581     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1906-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

Review 1.  Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections.

Authors:  C M Schlachta; J Mamazza; P A Seshadri; M Cadeddu; R Gregoire; E C Poulin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  The gap in laparoscopic colorectal experience between colon and rectal and general surgery residency training programs.

Authors:  Paul Charron; Robert Campbell; Samuel Dejesus; Joseph Gallagher; Paul Williamson; Andrea Ferrara
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy at academic centers.

Authors:  J Esteban Varela; Massimo Asolati; Sergio Huerta; Thomas Anthony
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Laparoscopy decreases postoperative complication rates after abdominal colectomy: results from the national surgical quality improvement program.

Authors:  Gregory D Kennedy; Charles Heise; Victoria Rajamanickam; Bruce Harms; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Tommy A Brown; Robert M Rush; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A single training center's experience with 200 consecutive cases of diverticulitis: can all patients be approached laparoscopically?

Authors:  Kelly A Garrett; Bradley J Champagne; Brian T Valerian; David Peterson; Edward C Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Ryan P Merkow; Heidi Nelson; Edward Wang; Clifford Y Ko; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Eunice Chang; Anthony J Senagore; Michael Broder
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  13 in total

1.  Resident training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: role of the porcine model.

Authors:  Marco La Torre; Carlo Caruso
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

3.  Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos.

Authors:  V Celentano; M Browning; C Hitchins; M C Giglio; M G Coleman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Use of robotic technology: a survey of practice patterns of the ASCRS Young Surgeons Committee.

Authors:  D S Keller; K Zaghiyan; J S Mizell
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Simulation and its role in training.

Authors:  Hoda Samia; Sadaf Khan; Justin Lawrence; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

6.  Live surgical demonstrations for minimally invasive colorectal training.

Authors:  Umut Kaan Unal; Eren Esen; Bengi Su Yilmaz; Erman Aytac; Ismail Ahmet Bilgin; Volkan Ozben; Emre Ozoran; Orhan Agcaoglu; Emre Balik; Bilgi Baca; Ismail Hamzaoglu; Tayfun Karahasanoglu; Dursun Bugra
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Colorectal Surgery Fellowship Improves In-hospital Mortality After Colectomy and Proctectomy Irrespective of Hospital and Surgeon Volume.

Authors:  Julia T Saraidaridis; Daniel A Hashimoto; David C Chang; Liliana G Bordeianou; Hiroko Kunitake
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe?

Authors:  H W Nijhof; R Silvis; R C L M Vuylsteke; S J Oosterling; H Rijna; H B A C Stockmann
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees.

Authors:  Hugh Mackenzie; Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Amjad Parvaiz; Austin G Acheson; John T Jenkins; John Griffith; Mark G Coleman; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.