Literature DB >> 32006086

Live surgical demonstrations for minimally invasive colorectal training.

Umut Kaan Unal1, Eren Esen2, Bengi Su Yilmaz3, Erman Aytac3, Ismail Ahmet Bilgin3, Volkan Ozben3, Emre Ozoran4, Orhan Agcaoglu4, Emre Balik4, Bilgi Baca3, Ismail Hamzaoglu3, Tayfun Karahasanoglu5, Dursun Bugra4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Live surgical demonstrations are considered an effective educational tool providing a chance for trainees to observe a real-time decision-making process of expert surgeons. No data exists evaluating the impact of live surgical demonstrations on the outcomes of minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study evaluates perioperative and short-term postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the setting of live surgical demonstrations.
METHODS: Patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery which was performed as live surgical demonstrations (the study group) performed between 2006 and 2018 were reviewed. These patients were case-matched with those undergoing operations in routine practice (the control group). The study and control group were compared for intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine live surgery cases in the study group were case-matched with its thirty-nine counterparts as the control group. Operating time was longer (200 vs 165 min; p = 0.002) and estimated intraoperative blood loss was higher in the study group (100 vs 55 ml; p = 0.008). Patients in the study group stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs 5 days; p = 0.001). While conversion (n = 4 vs n = 1, p = 0.358) and intraoperative complications (n = 6 vs n = 2, p = 0.2) were more frequent in the study group, these outcomes did not reach statistical significance. Overall complications were higher in the study group (n = 22 vs n = 9, p = 0.003). One patient underwent a reoperation due to postoperative bleeding, and one mortality occurred in the live surgery group.
CONCLUSIONS: Live surgical demonstrations in minimally invasive colorectal surgery seem to be associated with increased risk of operative morbidity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal; Live surgical demonstrations; Minimally invasive surgery; Surgical education; Surgical training

Year:  2020        PMID: 32006086     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01858-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  24 in total

1.  The ethics of live surgery: an ongoing debate.

Authors:  Sunil Morekar
Journal:  Indian J Med Ethics       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec

2.  Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Rodrigo Gonzalez; C Daniel Smith; Edward Mason; Titus Duncan; Russell Wilson; Jacqueline Miller; Bruce J Ramshaw
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Live surgical demonstration: is it worthwhile?

Authors:  Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2007-02

4.  Live case demonstrations: patient safety, ethics, consent, and conflicts.

Authors:  David F Kallmes; Harry J Cloft; Andrew Molyneux; Ingrid Burger; Waleed Brinjikji; Kieren P Murphy
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing?

Authors:  Sharon Stein; Jonah Stulberg; Bradley Champagne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases.

Authors:  Danilo Miskovic; Melody Ni; Susannah M Wyles; Paris Tekkis; George B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Live surgery courses: retrospective safety analysis after 11 editions.

Authors:  Amador García Ruiz de Gordejuela; Almino Cardoso Ramos; Manoel Galvao Neto; Mario Nora; Antonio J Torres García; Andrés Sánchez Pernaute; Jordi Pujol Gebelli
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  C P Delaney; V W Fazio; A J Senagore; B Robinson; A L Halverson; F H Remzi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  G S El-Gazzaz; R P Kiran; F H Remzi; T L Hull; D P Geisler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.