Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Use of robotic technology: a survey of practice patterns of the ASCRS Young Surgeons Committee.

Literature DB >> 30324411

Use of robotic technology: a survey of practice patterns of the ASCRS Young Surgeons Committee.

D S Keller¹, K Zaghiyan², J S Mizell³.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2018 PMID： 30324411 DOI： 10.1007/s10151-018-1862-6

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tech Coloproctol ISSN： 1123-6337 Impact factor: 3.781

× No keyword cloud information.

10 in total

1. Technical proficiency in hand-assisted laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery: determining how many cases are required to achieve mastery.

Authors: Rajesh Pendlimari; Stefan D Holubar; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson; John H Pemberton; Robert R Cima
Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2011-12-19

2. The impact of practice environment on laparoscopic colectomy utilization following colorectal residency: a survey of the ASCRS Young Surgeons.

Authors: Scott R Steele; Sharon L Stein; Liliana G Bordeianou; Eric Johnson; Dan O Herzig; Bradley J Champagne
Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.788

3. Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing?

Authors: Sharon Stein; Jonah Stulberg; Bradley Champagne
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 4.584

4. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.

Authors: Wissam J Halabi; Celeste Y Kang; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5. What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors: A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 3.781

6. Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.

Authors: J C Bolger; M P Broe; M A Zarog; A Looney; K McKevitt; D Walsh; S Giri; C Peirce; J C Coffey
Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.781

7. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.

Authors: David E Disbrow; Stephanie M Pannell; Beth-Ann Shanker; Jeremy Albright; Juan Wu; Amir Bastawrous; Mark Soliman; Jane Ferraro; Robert K Cleary
Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 2.891

8. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy.

Authors: Charlotte Tsui; Rachel Klein; Matthew Garabrant
Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 4.584

9. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors: David Jayne; Alessio Pigazzi; Helen Marshall; Julie Croft; Neil Corrigan; Joanne Copeland; Phil Quirke; Nick West; Tero Rautio; Niels Thomassen; Henry Tilney; Mark Gudgeon; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Richard Edlin; Claire Hulme; Julia Brown
Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 56.272

10. Trends and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Colorectal Cancer between 2004 and 2012- an Analysis using National Inpatient Database.

Authors: Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Chia-Chun Wang; Chia-Na Chang; Shih-Hao Lee; Matthew Lee; Tzu-Chun Hsu; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 4.379