Literature DB >> 15755290

An evaluation of rapid D-dimer assays for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis.

Chris Gardiner1, Coralie Pennaneac'h, Claire Walford, Samuel J Machin, Ian J Mackie.   

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of eight d-assays for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT); Biopool AutoDimer, Biopool MiniQuant, bioMèrieux MDA D-Dimer, VIDAS, Dade Behring D-Dimer Plus, Trinity Biotech AMAX, NycoCard D-dimer and IL Test D-Dimer. The assays were evaluated both as stand-alone tests, and in combination with pretest probability (PTP). D-dimer assays and PTP assessment were performed on 410 patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected acute DVT. DVT was diagnosed in 76 of 410 patients (18.5%) by compression ultrasound or other imaging techniques, as required. Receiver operator characteristics analysis established optimum cut-off values and these were compared with manufacturer's cut-off values where provided. As stand-alone tests, the assays varied immensely regarding cut-off value, negative predictive value (NPV 93-100%) and specificity (0-67%). At least one patient with confirmed DVT had a low d-dimer level by each method: to achieve 100% sensitivity it would be necessary to reduce cut-off values to levels below clinical usefulness. When low d-dimer was used in combination with PTP, six of eight methods achieved > or =98% NPV, with a diagnosis of DVT excluded in 16-44% of patients without the requirement for diagnostic imaging. The highly variable diagnostic performance of these d-dimer assays means that some assays are unsuitable for certain diagnostic strategies. However, our data suggest that the combination of sensitive D-dimer assays with an assessment of PTP may be used to exclude a diagnosis of DVT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15755290     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05394.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  5 in total

1.  Pulmonary embolism: investigation of the clinically assessed intermediate risk subgroup.

Authors:  D J Warren; S Matthews
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 5.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; J Forth; S Ryder; M J Galloway; A C Wood; I D Watson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Predictive value of D-dimer for portal vein thrombosis after portal hypertension surgery in hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis.

Authors:  Mei-Hai Deng; Bo Liu; He-Ping Fang; Wei-Dong Pan; Zhao-Feng Tang; Peng Deng; Yue-Si Zhong; Rui-Yun Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Safety and effectiveness of point-of-care monitoring devices in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; Allan Brown; James Jaffey; Lynda McGahan; Man-Chiu Poon; Karen Cimon
Journal:  Open Med       Date:  2007-10-16

5.  Evaluation of the usefulness of a D dimer test in combination with clinical pretest probability score in the prediction and exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism by medical residents.

Authors:  Tarek Owaidah; Nahlah AlGhasham; Saad AlGhamdi; Dania AlKhafaji; Bandar ALAmro; Mohamed Zeitouni; Fawaz Skaff; Hazzaa AlZahrani; Adher AlSayed; Naser ElKum; Mahmoud Moawad; Ahmed Nasmi; Mohannad Hawari; Khalid Maghrabi
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2014-11-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.