Literature DB >> 16403929

Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography.

Arne van Belle1, Harry R Büller, Menno V Huisman, Peter M Huisman, Karin Kaasjager, Pieter W Kamphuisen, Mark H H Kramer, Marieke J H A Kruip, Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp, Frank W G Leebeek, Mathilde Nijkeuter, Martin H Prins, Maaike Sohne, Lidwine W Tick.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Previous studies have evaluated the safety of relatively complex combinations of clinical decision rules and diagnostic tests in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of a simplified algorithm using a dichotomized clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective cohort study of consecutive patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism, conducted in 12 centers in the Netherlands from November 2002 through December 2004. The study population of 3306 patients included 82% outpatients and 57% women.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were categorized as "pulmonary embolism unlikely" or "pulmonary embolism likely" using a dichotomized version of the Wells clinical decision rule. Patients classified as unlikely had D-dimer testing, and pulmonary embolism was considered excluded if the D-dimer test result was normal. All other patients underwent CT, and pulmonary embolism was considered present or excluded based on the results. Anticoagulants were withheld from patients classified as excluded, and all patients were followed up for 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Symptomatic or fatal venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 3-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was classified as unlikely in 2206 patients (66.7%). The combination of pulmonary embolism unlikely and a normal D-dimer test result occurred in 1057 patients (32.0%), of whom 1028 were not treated with anticoagulants; subsequent nonfatal VTE occurred in 5 patients (0.5% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.2%-1.1%]). Computed tomography showed pulmonary embolism in 674 patients (20.4%). Computed tomography excluded pulmonary embolism in 1505 patients, of whom 1436 patients were not treated with anticoagulants; in these patients the 3-month incidence of VTE was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.0%). Pulmonary embolism was considered a possible cause of death in 7 patients after a negative CT scan (0.5% [95% CI, 0.2%-1.0%]). The algorithm was completed and allowed a management decision in 97.9% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic management strategy using a simple clinical decision rule, D-dimer testing, and CT is effective in the evaluation and management of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism. Its use is associated with low risk for subsequent fatal and nonfatal VTE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16403929     DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.2.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  162 in total

1.  Pulmonary embolism: investigation of the clinically assessed intermediate risk subgroup.

Authors:  D J Warren; S Matthews
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Chinese multi-center study of lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jia He; Feng Wang; Hao-jie Dai; Mei Li; Qian Wang; Zhiming Yao; Bin Lv; Chang-ming Xiong; Jian-guo He; Zhi-hong Liu; Zuo-Xiang He; Wei Fang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Differential diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in outpatients with non-specific cardiopulmonary symptoms.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Davide Luciani; Andrea Rubboli; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Raffaele Landolfi; Carlo De Luca; Fernando Porro; Marco Moia; Sophie Testa; Davide Imberti; Guido Bertolini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Prognostic significance of multidetector computed tomography in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism: rationale, methodology and reproducibility for the PROTECT study.

Authors:  David Jiménez; José Luis Lobo; Manuel Monreal; Remedios Otero; Roger D Yusen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 1: epidemiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  D-dimer testing: advantages and limitations in emergency medicine for managing acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 7.  Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Les Irwig; Jonathan Craig; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

8.  D-dimer for the diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism in the emergency department: a Janus-face marker.

Authors:  Roberto Manfredini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Usefulness of Clinical Prediction Rules, D-dimer, and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis to Predict Pulmonary Embolism in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Asifa Karamat; Shazia Awan; Muhammad Ghazanfar Hussain; Fahad Al Hameed; Faheem Butt; Ali Saeed Wahla
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2017-03

10.  Can we predict daily adherence to warfarin?: Results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study.

Authors:  Alec B Platt; A Russell Localio; Colleen M Brensinger; Dean G Cruess; Jason D Christie; Robert Gross; Catherine S Parker; Maureen Price; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Craig W Newcomb; Brian L Strom; Mitchell S Laskin; Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.