| Literature DB >> 21936890 |
Lucieli T Cambri1, Gustavo G de Araujo, Ana C Ghezzi, José D Botezelli, Maria A R Mello.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malnutrition in utero can "program" the fetal tissues, making them more vulnerable to metabolic disturbances. Also there is association between excessive consumption of fructose and the development of metabolic syndrome. However, there is little information regarding the acute effect of physical exercise on subjects recovered from malnutrition and/or fed with a fructose-rich diet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the metabolic aspects and the response to acute physical exercise in rats recovered from fetal protein malnutrition with a fructose-rich diet.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21936890 PMCID: PMC3196910 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Composition of the diets
| Components (g/kg) | Fructose | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 202 | 71.5 | 202 | |
| 397 | 480 | - | |
| 130.5 | 159 | - | |
| 100 | 121 | 27.6 | |
| - | - | 600 | |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 70 | 70 | 70 | |
| 35 | 35 | 35 | |
| 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| 50 | 50 | 50 | |
| 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
1According to the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN-93G) - [19]. Diet containing 17% protein.
2 According to Latorraca et al. [7]. Diet containing 6% protein.
3 According to Moura et al. [11]. Diet containing 17% protein and 60% fructose.
4Values corrected according to the amount of protein in the casein.
Body weight gain from weaning (21 days) until the end of the experiment (60 days), weight and total lipids concentrations of the adipose tissue from different anatomical regions at the end of the experiment (60 days)
| B | BF | LB | LF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 161.4 ± 25.2b | 103.4 ± 29.6d | 186.1 ± 29.8a | 134.5 ± 22.9c | |
| 0.57 ± 0.14 | 0.45 ± 0.17 | 0.48 ± 0.10 | 0.55 ± 0.11 | |
| 0.35 ± 0.13 | 0.25 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.13 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | |
| 0.55 ± 0.08a | 0.40 ± 0.10b | 0.42 ± 0.07b | 0.39 ± 0.13b | |
| 70.23 ± 15.60 | 59.57 ± 13.90 | 64.32 ± 17.09 | 75.42 ± 17.73 | |
| 21.35 ± 8.72b | 35.59 ± 9.78a | 31.36 ± 8.78ab | 28.67 ± 6.68ab | |
| 38.74 ± 9.77 | 37.32 ± 5.24 | 33.67 ± 7.25 | 31.26 ± 3.38 |
Results expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of 10 rats per group.
B: balanced; BF: balanced/fructose; LB: low protein/balanced; LF: low protein/fructose.
Different letters indicate significant difference among groups. Two-Way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls' Post-Hoc (p < 0.05).
Serum variables at rest (R) and after acute exercise (E) at the end of the experiment (60 days)
| B | BF | LB | LF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 107 ± 15a | 110 ± 9a | 106 ± 19a | 83 ± 25b | ||
| 126 ± 31* | 134 ± 26* | 148 ± 35* | 152 ± 26* | ||
| 61 ± 13ab | 79 ± 12a | 66 ± 28ab | 53 ± 23b | ||
| 95 ± 25* | 106 ± 30* | 110 ± 22* | 104 ± 29* | ||
| 67 ± 14b | 124 ± 21a | 89 ± 26b | 119 ± 27a | ||
| 81 ± 13b* | 105 ± 14a* | 82 ± 16b | 97 ± 26ab | ||
| 39 ± 6b | 47 ± 4a | 36 ± 4b | 39 ± 8b | ||
| 50 ± 5ab* | 54 ± 6a* | 45 ± 4b* | 50 ± 7ab* | ||
| 59 ± 14a | 75 ± 14b | 53 ± 15a | 50 ± 16a | ||
| 58 ± 9 | 57 ± 11* | 49 ± 12 | 53 ± 10 | ||
| 5.5 ± 0.1b | 5.6 ± 0.1b | 5.5 ± 0.3b | 5.8 ± 0.2a | ||
| 5.6 ± 0.1* | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.1 | ||
| 3.9 ± 0.3b | 3.8 ± 0.2b | 4.2 ± 0.3a | 4.1 ± 0.6a | ||
| 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3.9 ± 0.2* | 3.9 ± 0.3 |
Results expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of 10 rats per group.
B: balanced; BF: balanced/fructose; LB: low protein/balanced; LF: low protein/fructose.
R: at rest; E: after acute physical exercise.
Different letters indicate significant difference among groups. Two-Way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls' Post-Hoc (p < 0.05).
*intra-group difference by Student's t-test (at rest vs. acute physical exercise).
Figure 1Tissue variables (mg/100 g) at rest and after acute physical exercise at the end of the experiment (60 days). Results expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of 10 rats per group. B: balanced; BF: balanced/fructose; LB: low protein/balanced; LF: low protein/fructose. Different letters indicate significant difference among groups. Two-Way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls' Post-Hoc (p < 0.05). *intra-group difference by Student's t-test (at rest vs. acute physical exercise).