Fabrizio Billi1, Paul Benya, Aaron Kavanaugh, John Adams, Harry McKellop, Edward Ebramzadeh. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The J. Vernon Luck Sr., MD, Orthopaedic Research Center at Orthopaedic Hospital, UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90007, USA. fbilli@laoh.ucla.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were introduced as alternatives to conventional polyethylene in hip arthroplasties to reduce wear. Characterization of wear particles has been particularly challenging due to the low amount and small size of wear particles. Current methods of analysis of such particles have shortcomings, including particle loss, clumping, and inaccurate morphologic and chemical characterization. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe a method to recover and characterize metal and ceramic particles that (1) improves particle purification, separation, and display; (2) allows for precise particle shape characterization; (3) allows accurate chemical identification; and (4) minimizes particle loss. METHODS: After enzymatic digestion, a single pass of ultracentrifugation cleaned and deposited particles onto silicon wafers or grids for imaging analysis. During centrifugation, particles were passed through multiple layers of denaturants and a metal-selective high-density layer that minimized protein and nucleic acid contamination. The protocol prevented aggregation, providing well-dispersed particles for chemical and morphologic analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and accuracy of this protocol by recovering gold nanobeads and metal and ceramic particles from joint simulator wear tests. RESULTS: The new protocol recovered particles ranging in size from nanometers to micrometers and enabled accurate morphologic and chemical characterization of individual particles. CONCLUSION: Both polyethylene and metal wear debris can be simultaneously analyzed from the same sample by combining a silicon wafer display protocol for polyethylene and the metal and ceramics silicon wafer display protocol. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate analysis of wear debris is essential in understanding the processes that produce debris and a key step in development of more durable and biocompatible implants.
BACKGROUND:Metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were introduced as alternatives to conventional polyethylene in hip arthroplasties to reduce wear. Characterization of wear particles has been particularly challenging due to the low amount and small size of wear particles. Current methods of analysis of such particles have shortcomings, including particle loss, clumping, and inaccurate morphologic and chemical characterization. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe a method to recover and characterize metal and ceramic particles that (1) improves particle purification, separation, and display; (2) allows for precise particle shape characterization; (3) allows accurate chemical identification; and (4) minimizes particle loss. METHODS: After enzymatic digestion, a single pass of ultracentrifugation cleaned and deposited particles onto silicon wafers or grids for imaging analysis. During centrifugation, particles were passed through multiple layers of denaturants and a metal-selective high-density layer that minimized protein and nucleic acid contamination. The protocol prevented aggregation, providing well-dispersed particles for chemical and morphologic analysis. We evaluated the efficacy and accuracy of this protocol by recovering gold nanobeads and metal and ceramic particles from joint simulator wear tests. RESULTS: The new protocol recovered particles ranging in size from nanometers to micrometers and enabled accurate morphologic and chemical characterization of individual particles. CONCLUSION: Both polyethylene and metal wear debris can be simultaneously analyzed from the same sample by combining a silicon wafer display protocol for polyethylene and the metal and ceramics silicon wafer display protocol. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate analysis of wear debris is essential in understanding the processes that produce debris and a key step in development of more durable and biocompatible implants.
Authors: H Pandit; S Glyn-Jones; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D Whitwell; C L M Gibbons; S Ostlere; N Athanasou; H S Gill; D W Murray Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Br Date: 2008-07
Authors: Christopher Brown; Sophie Williams; Joanne L Tipper; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 4.727
Authors: Fang Lu; Matt Royle; Ferdinand V Lali; Alister J Hart; Simon Collins; Jonathan Housden; Julia C Shelton Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: Robert A Pedowitz; Fabrizio Billi; Aaron Kavanaugh; Andrew Colbert; Sen Liu; Felix H Savoie; Zongbing You Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-07-30 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Paul D Benya; Aaron Kavanaugh; Martin Zakarian; Philip Söderlind; Tea Jashashvili; Nianli Zhang; Erik I Waldorff; James T Ryaby; Fabrizio Billi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ashley A Stratton-Powell; Sophie Williams; Joanne L Tipper; Anthony C Redmond; Claire L Brockett Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 3.405