Literature DB >> 21932057

Fragment-based prediction of skin sensitization using recursive partitioning.

Jing Lu1, Mingyue Zheng, Yong Wang, Qiancheng Shen, Xiaomin Luo, Hualiang Jiang, Kaixian Chen.   

Abstract

Skin sensitization is an important toxic endpoint in the risk assessment of chemicals. In this paper, structure-activity relationships analysis was performed on the skin sensitization potential of 357 compounds with local lymph node assay data. Structural fragments were extracted by GASTON (GrAph/Sequence/Tree extractiON) from the training set. Eight fragments with accuracy significantly higher than 0.73 (p<0.1) were retained to make up an indicator descriptor fragment. The fragment descriptor and eight other physicochemical descriptors closely related to the endpoint were calculated to construct the recursive partitioning tree (RP tree) for classification. The balanced accuracy of the training set, test set I, and test set II in the leave-one-out model were 0.846, 0.800, and 0.809, respectively. The results highlight that fragment-based RP tree is a preferable method for identifying skin sensitizers. Moreover, the selected fragments provide useful structural information for exploring sensitization mechanisms, and RP tree creates a graphic tree to identify the most important properties associated with skin sensitization. They can provide some guidance for designing of drugs with lower sensitization level. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21932057     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9472-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  31 in total

1.  Analysis of a large structure/biological activity data set using recursive partitioning.

Authors:  A Rusinko; M W Farmen; C G Lambert; P L Brown; S S Young
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec

2.  Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization.

Authors:  David W Roberts; Aynur O Aptula; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 3.  Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.

Authors:  Maja Divkovic; Camilla K Pease; G Frank Gerberick; David A Basketter
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Application of the random forest method in studies of local lymph node assay based skin sensitization data.

Authors:  Shengqiao Li; Adam Fedorowicz; Harshinder Singh; Sidney C Soderholm
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay.

Authors:  David W Roberts; Aynur O Aptula; Grace Patlewicz
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  TIMES-SS--a promising tool for the assessment of skin sensitization hazard. A characterization with respect to the OECD validation principles for (Q)SARs and an external evaluation for predictivity.

Authors:  Grace Patlewicz; Sabcho D Dimitrov; Lawrence K Low; Petra S Kern; Gergana D Dimitrova; Mike I H Comber; Aynur O Aptula; Richard D Phillips; Jay Niemelä; Charlotte Madsen; Eva B Wedebye; David W Roberts; Paul T Bailey; Ovanes G Mekenyan
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 7.  The chemistry of contact allergy: why is a molecule allergenic?

Authors:  D Basketter; A Dooms-Goossens; A T Karlberg; J P Lepoittevin
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods.

Authors:  G Frank Gerberick; Cindy A Ryan; Petra S Kern; Harald Schlatter; Rebecca J Dearman; Ian Kimber; Grace Y Patlewicz; David A Basketter
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.845

Review 9.  Predictive drug allergy testing: an alternative viewpoint.

Authors:  W J Pichler
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2001-02-02       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Prediction of skin sensitization with a particle swarm optimized support vector machine.

Authors:  Hua Yuan; Jianping Huang; Chenzhong Cao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 6.208

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploration of structural and physicochemical requirements and search of virtual hits for aminopeptidase N inhibitors.

Authors:  Amit K Halder; Achintya Saha; Tarun Jha
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.943

2.  Cheminformatics-driven discovery of polymeric micelle formulations for poorly soluble drugs.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Duhyeong Hwang; Eugene Muratov; Marina Sokolsky-Papkov; Ekaterina Varlamova; Natasha Vinod; Chaemin Lim; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha; Alexander Kabanov
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Skin Doctor: Machine Learning Models for Skin Sensitization Prediction that Provide Estimates and Indicators of Prediction Reliability.

Authors:  Anke Wilm; Conrad Stork; Christoph Bauer; Andreas Schepky; Jochen Kühnl; Johannes Kirchmair
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Stephen J Capuzzi; Eugene Muratov; Rodolpho C Braga; Thomas Thornton; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Green Chem       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.182

5.  Finding candidate drugs for hepatitis C based on chemical-chemical and chemical-protein interactions.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Jing Lu; Tao Huang; Jun Yin; Lai Wei; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.