Literature DB >> 16978028

Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization.

David W Roberts1, Aynur O Aptula, Grace Patlewicz.   

Abstract

Several recent (1999 onward) publications on skin sensitization to aldehydes and ketones, which can sensitize by covalent binding to skin protein via Schiff base formation, present QSARs based on the Taft sigma parameter to model reactivity and log P to model hydrophobicity. Here, all of the data are reanalyzed together in a stepwise self-consistent way using the parameters log P (octanol/water) and Sigmasigma, the latter being the sum of Taft sigma values for the two groups R and R' in RCOR'. A QSAR is derived: pEC3 = 1.12(+/-0.07) Sigmasigma + 0.42(+/-0.04) log P - 0.62(+/-0.13); n = 16 R(2) = 0.952 R(2)(adj) = 0.945 s = 0.12 F = 129.6, based on mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA) data for 11 aliphatic aldehydes, 1 alpha-ketoester and 4 alpha,beta-diketones. In developing this QSAR, an initial regression equation for a training set of 10 aldehydes was found to predict a test set consisting of the other 6 compounds. The QSAR is found to be well predictive for LLNA data on a series of alpha,gamma-diketones and also correctly predicts the nonsensitizing properties of simple dialkylketones. It is shown to meet all of the criteria of the OECD principles for applicability within regulatory practice. In view of the structural diversity within the sets of compounds considered here, the present findings confirm the view that within the mechanistic applicability domain the differences in sensitization potential are dependent solely on differences in chemical reactivity and partitioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978028     DOI: 10.1021/tx060102o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  6 in total

1.  Fragment-based prediction of skin sensitization using recursive partitioning.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Mingyue Zheng; Yong Wang; Qiancheng Shen; Xiaomin Luo; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  An evaluation of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting skin sensitisation potential.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; D W Roberts; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Evaluation of the hypersensitivity potential of alternative butter flavorings.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Jennifer Franko; J R Wells; Ewa Lukomska; B Jean Meade
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Evaluating Confidence in Toxicity Assessments Based on Experimental Data and In Silico Predictions.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Lennart T Anger; Romualdo Benigni; David Bower; Frank Bringezu; Kevin M Crofton; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Magdalena Dettwiler; Markus Frericks; Fjodor Melnikov; Scott Miller; David W Roberts; Diana Suarez-Rodriguez; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Elena Lo Piparo; Raymond R Tice; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-11-08

6.  QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Stephen J Capuzzi; Eugene Muratov; Rodolpho C Braga; Thomas Thornton; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Green Chem       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.