Literature DB >> 17226926

Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitization. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay.

David W Roberts1, Aynur O Aptula, Grace Patlewicz.   

Abstract

This article presents an overview of electrophilic reaction mechanisms relevant to skin sensitization, with reference to a published skin sensitization test data set for 106 chemicals. Where appropriate to aid the interpretation, additional data on a small number of further compounds are also discussed. It is shown that there is a close correspondence in the way differences and similarities in skin sensitization potency of chemicals relate to differences and similarities in their physical organic chemistry and electrophilic reaction mechanistic chemistry. The 106 chemicals are classified into their reaction mechanistic applicability domains, and reactivity-sensitization trends are analyzed for each domain: the Michael acceptor and pro-Michael acceptor electrophile domain; the SNAr electrophile domain; the SN2 electrophile domain; the Schiff base electrophile domain; the acyl transfer electrophile domain; and the non-electrophilic non-pro-electrophilic domain. The last of these domains should be populated mainly by non-sensitizers. Classification of 87 of the 106 compounds, using these domains, was straightforward. In most of the domains and subdomains where there are sufficient compounds, clear trends can be seen, in conformity with the Relative Alkylation Index (RAI) model, between sensitization potential and reactivity/hydrophobicity. Of the remaining 19 compounds, 7 are alpha-X-methyl-gamma-lactones that on the basis of published organic chemistry studies and guinea pig sensitization data can be classed as pro-Michael acceptors by elimination of HX but that are mostly negative in the LLNA, indicating a difference in bioactivation capabilities between mice and guinea pigs. The other 12 compounds, whose chemistry was not immediately obvious, were found after further analysis and literature research to fit into appropriate mechanistic domains that rationalize their skin sensitizing properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17226926     DOI: 10.1021/tx060121y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  14 in total

1.  Antioxidant sulforaphane and sensitizer trinitrobenzene sulfonate induce carboxylesterase-1 through a novel element transactivated by nuclear factor-E2 related factor-2.

Authors:  Yi-Tzai Chen; Deshi Shi; Dongfang Yang; Bingfang Yan
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Fragment-based prediction of skin sensitization using recursive partitioning.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Mingyue Zheng; Yong Wang; Qiancheng Shen; Xiaomin Luo; Hualiang Jiang; Kaixian Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Application of IATA - A case study in evaluating the global and local performance of a Bayesian network model for skin sensitization.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Mechanistic understanding of molecular initiating events (MIEs) using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Paul N Sanderson; Wendy Simpson; Richard Cubberley; Maja Aleksic; Stephen Gutsell; Paul J Russell
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.524

5.  Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Eugene Muratov; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Pyridoxylamine reactivity kinetics as an amine based nucleophile for screening electrophilic dermal sensitizers.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Wilbes Mbiya; Risikat Ajibola Adigun; Moshood K Morakinyo; Brandon F Law; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  An evaluation of selected (Q)SARs/expert systems for predicting skin sensitisation potential.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; D W Roberts; G Patlewicz
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Mixture toxicity of SN2-reactive soft electrophiles: 1. Evaluation of mixtures containing α-halogenated acetonitriles.

Authors:  D A Dawson; J Jeyaratnam; T Mooneyham; G Pöch; T W Schultz
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Methyl methacrylate and respiratory sensitization: a critical review.

Authors:  Jonathan Borak; Cheryl Fields; Larry S Andrews; Mark A Pemberton
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  Reactivity measurement in estimation of benzoquinone and benzoquinone derivatives' allergenicity.

Authors:  Wilbes Mbiya; Itai Chipinda; Reuben H Simoyi; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.221

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.