Literature DB >> 21928661

Equating quantitative emphysema measurements on different CT image reconstructions.

Seth T Bartel1, Andrew J Bierhals, Thomas K Pilgram, Cheng Hong, Kenneth B Schechtman, Susan H Conradi, David S Gierada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To mathematically model the relationship between CT measurements of emphysema obtained from images reconstructed using different section thicknesses and kernels and to evaluate the accuracy of the models for converting measurements to those of a reference reconstruction.
METHODS: CT raw data from the lung cancer screening examinations of 138 heavy smokers were reconstructed at 15 different combinations of section thickness and kernel. An emphysema index was quantified as the percentage of the lung with attenuation below -950 HU (EI950). Linear, quadratic, and power functions were used to model the relationship between EI950 values obtained with a reference 1 mm, medium smooth kernel reconstruction and values from each of the other 14 reconstructions. Preferred models were selected using the corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc), coefficients of determination (R2), and residuals (conversion errors), and cross-validated by a jackknife approach using the leave-one-out method.
RESULTS: The preferred models were power functions, with model R2 values ranging from 0.949 to 0.998. The errors in converting EI950 measurements from other reconstructions to the 1 mm, medium smooth kernel reconstruction in leave-one-out testing were less than 3.0 index percentage points for all reconstructions, and less than 1.0 index percentage point for five reconstructions. Conversion errors were related in part to image noise, emphysema distribution, and attenuation histogram parameters. Conversion inaccuracy related to increased kernel sharpness tended to be reduced by increased section thickness.
CONCLUSIONS: Image reconstruction-related differences in quantitative emphysema measurements were successfully modeled using power functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928661      PMCID: PMC3165435          DOI: 10.1118/1.3615624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

Review 1.  Using computed tomographic scanning to advance understanding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  John Reilly
Journal:  Proc Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2006-07

2.  Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry.

Authors:  A A Bankier; V De Maertelaer; C Keyzer; P A Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  CT densitometry of the lungs: scanner performance.

Authors:  G J Kemerink; R J Lamers; G R Thelissen; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  CT lung densitometry: dependence of CT number histograms on sample volume and consequences for scan protocol comparability.

Authors:  G J Kemerink; H H Kruize; R J Lamers; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Association between markers of emphysema and more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  P Boschetto; S Quintavalle; E Zeni; S Leprotti; A Potena; L Ballerin; A Papi; G Palladini; M Luisetti; L Annovazzi; P Iadarola; E De Rosa; L M Fabbri; C E Mapp
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.

Authors:  Afarine Madani; Jacqueline Zanen; Viviane de Maertelaer; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The association between small airway obstruction and emphysema phenotypes in COPD.

Authors:  Won-Dong Kim; Sean H Ling; Harvey O Coxson; John C English; John Yee; Robert D Levy; Peter D Paré; James C Hogg
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Advanced emphysema in African-American and white patients: do differences exist?

Authors:  Wissam M Chatila; Eric A Hoffman; John Gaughan; G Blake Robinswood; Gerard J Criner
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry.

Authors:  Afarine Madani; Viviane De Maertelaer; Jacqueline Zanen; Pierre Alain Gevenois
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema.

Authors:  P A Gevenois; P De Vuyst; V de Maertelaer; J Zanen; D Jacobovitz; M G Cosio; J C Yernault
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 21.405

View more
  9 in total

1.  Adaptive quantification and longitudinal analysis of pulmonary emphysema with a hidden Markov measure field model.

Authors:  Yrjo Hame; Elsa D Angelini; Eric A Hoffman; R Graham Barr; Andrew F Laine
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Investigating the Robustness Neighborhood Gray Tone Difference Matrix and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix Radiomic Features on Clinical Computed Tomography Systems Using Anthropomorphic Phantoms: Evidence From a Multivendor Study.

Authors:  Usman Mahmood; Aditya P Apte; Joseph O Deasy; C Ross Schmidtlein; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  DERIVATION OF A TEST STATISTIC FOR EMPHYSEMA QUANTIFICATION.

Authors:  Gonzalo Vegas-Sanchez-Ferrero; George Washko; Farbod N Rahaghi; Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo; R San José Estépar
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2016-06-16

4.  Emphysema Quantification on Cardiac CT Scans Using Hidden Markov Measure Field Model: The MESA Lung Study.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Elsa D Angelini; Pallavi P Balte; Eric A Hoffman; Colin O Wu; Bharath A Venkatesh; R Graham Barr; Andrew F Laine
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2016-10-02

5.  Lung Mass in Smokers.

Authors:  George R Washko; Gregory L Kinney; James C Ross; Raúl San José Estépar; MeiLan K Han; Mark T Dransfield; Victor Kim; Hiroto Hatabu; Carolyn E Come; Russell P Bowler; Edwin K Silverman; James Crapo; David A Lynch; John Hokanson; Alejandro A Diaz
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Lung hyperaeration assessment by computed tomography: correction of reconstruction-induced bias.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Claudia Brusasco; Francesco Corradi; Francesco Paparo; Alessandro Garlaschi; Peter Herrmann; Michael Quintel; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Normalizing computed tomography data reconstructed with different filter kernels: effect on emphysema quantification.

Authors:  Leticia Gallardo-Estrella; David A Lynch; Mathias Prokop; Douglas Stinson; Jordan Zach; Philip F Judy; Bram van Ginneken; Eva M van Rikxoort
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Ultra-low-dose sequential computed tomography for quantitative lung aeration assessment-a translational study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Ball; Anja Braune; Francesco Corradi; Claudia Brusasco; Alessandro Garlaschi; Thomas Kiss; Thomas Bluth; Francesca Simonassi; Alice Bergamaschi; Jörg Kotzerke; Marcus J Schultz; Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Paolo Pelosi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2017-04-04

9.  The Impact of Sources of Variability on Parametric Response Mapping of Lung CT Scans.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Maria Bule; Benjamin A Hoff; Ryan Chamberlain; David A Lynch; Jadranka Stojanovska; Fernando J Martinez; Meilan K Han; Ella A Kazerooni; Brian D Ross; Craig J Galbán
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2015-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.