Literature DB >> 21928634

3D automatic anatomy segmentation based on iterative graph-cut-ASM.

Xinjian Chen1, Ulas Bagci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper studies the feasibility of developing an automatic anatomy segmentation (AAS) system in clinical radiology and demonstrates its operation on clinical 3D images.
METHODS: The AAS system, the authors are developing consists of two main parts: object recognition and object delineation. As for recognition, a hierarchical 3D scale-based multiobject method is used for the multiobject recognition task, which incorporates intensity weighted ball-scale (b-scale) information into the active shape model (ASM). For object delineation, an iterative graph-cut-ASM (IGCASM) algorithm is proposed, which effectively combines the rich statistical shape information embodied in ASM with the globally optimal delineation capability of the GC method. The presented IGCASM algorithm is a 3D generalization of the 2D GC-ASM method that they proposed previously in Chen et al. [Proc. SPIE, 7259, 72590C1-72590C-8 (2009)]. The proposed methods are tested on two datasets comprised of images obtained from 20 patients (10 male and 10 female) of clinical abdominal CT scans, and 11 foot magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The test is for four organs (liver, left and right kidneys, and spleen) segmentation, five foot bones (calcaneus, tibia, cuboid, talus, and navicular). The recognition and delineation accuracies were evaluated separately. The recognition accuracy was evaluated in terms of translation, rotation, and scale (size) error. The delineation accuracy was evaluated in terms of true and false positive volume fractions (TPVF, FPVF). The efficiency of the delineation method was also evaluated on an Intel Pentium IV PC with a 3.4 GHZ CPU machine.
RESULTS: The recognition accuracies in terms of translation, rotation, and scale error over all organs are about 8 mm, 10 degrees and 0.03, and over all foot bones are about 3.5709 mm, 0.35 degrees and 0.025, respectively. The accuracy of delineation over all organs for all subjects as expressed in TPVF and FPVF is 93.01% and 0.22%, and all foot bones for all subjects are 93.75% and 0.28%, respectively. While the delineations for the four organs can be accomplished quite rapidly with average of 78 s, the delineations for the five foot bones can be accomplished with average of 70 s.
CONCLUSIONS: The experimental results showed the feasibility and efficacy of the proposed automatic anatomy segmentation system: (a) the incorporation of shape priors into the GC framework is feasible in 3D as demonstrated previously for 2D images; (b) our results in 3D confirm the accuracy behavior observed in 2D. The hybrid strategy IGCASM seems to be more robust and accurate than ASM and GC individually; and (c) delineations within body regions and foot bones of clinical importance can be accomplished quite rapidly within 1.5 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21928634      PMCID: PMC3298556          DOI: 10.1118/1.3602070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Scale-based diffusive image filtering preserving boundary sharpness and fine structures.

Authors:  P K Saha; J K Udupa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Improved watershed transform for medical image segmentation using prior information.

Authors:  V Grau; A U J Mewes; M Alcañiz; R Kikinis; S K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  3D image segmentation of deformable objects with joint shape-intensity prior models using level sets.

Authors:  Jing Yang; James S Duncan
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  An experimental comparison of min-cut/max-flow algorithms for energy minimization in vision.

Authors:  Yuri Boykov; Vladimir Kolmogorov
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  A framework for evaluating image segmentation algorithms.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Vicki R Leblanc; Ying Zhuge; Celina Imielinska; Hilary Schmidt; Leanne M Currie; Bruce E Hirsch; James Woodburn
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Hybrid image segmentation using watersheds and fast region merging.

Authors:  K Haris; S N Efstratiadis; N Maglaveras; A K Katsaggelos
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

7.  Oriented active shape models.

Authors:  Jiamin Liu; Jayaram K Udupa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Analysis of in vivo 3-D internal kinematics of the joints of the foot.

Authors:  J K Udupa; B E Hirsch; H J Hillstrom; G R Bauer; J B Kneeland
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Automatic anatomy recognition via multiobject oriented active shape models.

Authors:  Xinjian Chen; Jayaram K Udupa; Abass Alavi; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  A generic approach to pathological lung segmentation.

Authors:  Awais Mansoor; Ulas Bagci; Ziyue Xu; Brent Foster; Kenneth N Olivier; Jason M Elinoff; Anthony F Suffredini; Jayaram K Udupa; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Multi-Atlas Spleen Segmentation on CT Using Adaptive Context Learning.

Authors:  Jiaqi Liu; Yuankai Huo; Zhoubing Xu; Albert Assad; Richard G Abramson; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2017-02-24

3.  Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Maysam Shahedi; Derek W Cool; Glenn S Bauman; Matthew Bastian-Jordan; Aaron Fenster; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Automatic 3D liver location and segmentation via convolutional neural network and graph cut.

Authors:  Fang Lu; Fa Wu; Peijun Hu; Zhiyi Peng; Dexing Kong
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Automatic detection and quantification of tree-in-bud (TIB) opacities from CT scans.

Authors:  Ulas Bagci; Jianhua Yao; Albert Wu; Jesus Caban; Tara N Palmore; Anthony F Suffredini; Omer Aras; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images.

Authors:  Ulas Bagci; Jayaram K Udupa; Neil Mendhiratta; Brent Foster; Ziyue Xu; Jianhua Yao; Xinjian Chen; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  Three-dimensional segmentation of fluid-associated abnormalities in retinal OCT: probability constrained graph-search-graph-cut.

Authors:  Xinjian Chen; Meindert Niemeijer; Li Zhang; Kyungmoo Lee; Michael D Abramoff; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Segmentation of PET images for computer-aided functional quantification of tuberculosis in small animal models.

Authors:  Brent Foster; Ulas Bagci; Bappaditya Dey; Brian Luna; William Bishai; Sanjay Jain; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Family of boundary overlap metrics for the evaluation of medical image segmentation.

Authors:  Varduhi Yeghiazaryan; Irina Voiculescu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-19

10.  Body-wide hierarchical fuzzy modeling, recognition, and delineation of anatomy in medical images.

Authors:  Jayaram K Udupa; Dewey Odhner; Liming Zhao; Yubing Tong; Monica M S Matsumoto; Krzysztof C Ciesielski; Alexandre X Falcao; Pavithra Vaideeswaran; Victoria Ciesielski; Babak Saboury; Syedmehrdad Mohammadianrasanani; Sanghun Sin; Raanan Arens; Drew A Torigian
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.