Literature DB >> 21922159

Reasons for choice of referral physician among primary care and specialist physicians.

Michael L Barnett1, Nancy L Keating, Nicholas A Christakis, A James O'Malley, Bruce E Landon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Specialty referral patterns can affect health care costs as well as clinical outcomes. For a given clinical problem, referring physicians usually have a choice of several physicians to whom they can refer. Once the decision to refer is made, the choice of individual physician may have important downstream effects.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the reasons why primary care and specialist physicians choose certain specific colleagues to refer to and how those reasons differ by specialty.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional Web-based survey supplemented with analysis of administrative claims data. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 616 physicians in office-based patient care specialties who were members of an academic physicians' organization and treated Medicare patients in 2006. MAIN MEASURES: A total of 386 respondents (63% response rate) were presented with a "roster" of other physicians' names with whom we predicted they had a relationship based on sharing Medicare patients. Among physicians in their "professional network" (consisting of any listed physician with whom respondents acknowledged a professional relationship), respondents reported if they referred to those physicians, and if so, provided up to two reasons why they referred to that particular colleague. Using logistic regression, we examined the likelihood that different specialists would endorse specific reasons for referring to chosen colleagues. KEY
RESULTS: Primary care physicians (PCPs) initiated referrals to 66% of their "professional network" colleagues, while medical and surgical specialists initiated referrals to 49% and 52%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both versus PCPs). After adjustment, medical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite ease of communication with colleagues (RR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.49-0.91), and medical and surgical specialists were less likely than PCPs to cite "shares my medical record system" as a reason to refer (medical specialist RR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.03-0.40, surgical specialist RR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05-0.78).
CONCLUSIONS: Specialists frequently initiate referrals, bypassing PCPs. In choosing specific physicians to refer to, PCPs are more often concerned with between-physician communication and patient access. Modifying referral practices among doctors may need to account for such patterns of behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21922159      PMCID: PMC3326096          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-011-1861-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  23 in total

1.  Variations in primary care physician referral rates.

Authors:  P Franks; J Zwanziger; C Mooney; M Sorbero
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prevalence of health problems and primary care physicians' specialty referral decisions.

Authors:  C B Forrest; R J Reid
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 3.  How physicians make referrals.

Authors:  R Javalgi; W B Joseph; W R Gombeski; J A Lester
Journal:  J Health Care Mark       Date:  1993

4.  Health care spending and quality in year 1 of the alternative quality contract.

Authors:  Zirui Song; Dana Gelb Safran; Bruce E Landon; Yulei He; Randall P Ellis; Robert E Mechanic; Matthew P Day; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists.

Authors:  E C Schneider; A M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.

Authors:  D A Asch; M K Jedrziewski; N A Christakis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest; Paul A Nutting; Barbara Starfield; Sarah von Schrader
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Physician referrals in a competitive environment. An estimate of the economic impact of a referral.

Authors:  J K Glenn; F H Lawler; M S Hoerl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Referral of patients to specialists: factors affecting choice of specialist by primary care physicians.

Authors:  Kraig S Kinchen; Lisa A Cooper; David Levine; Nae Yuh Wang; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  26 in total

1.  The un-managed system of Medicare referrals.

Authors:  Alice Hm Chen; Diane Rittenhouse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trends in physician referrals in the United States, 1999-2009.

Authors:  Michael L Barnett; Zirui Song; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-01-23

3.  Understanding Patients' Preferences for Referrals to Specialists for an Asymptomatic Condition.

Authors:  Robert Dunlea; Leslie Lenert
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Analysis of the U.S. patient referral network.

Authors:  Chuankai An; A James O'Malley; Daniel N Rockmore; Corey D Stock
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Is Self-Referral Associated with Higher Quality Care?

Authors:  Craig Evan Pollack; Afshin Rastegar; Nancy L Keating; John L Adams; Maria Pisu; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Peers without fears? Barriers to effective communication among primary care physicians and oncologists about diagnostic delays in cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Minal Kale; Laura Robbins; David Pfister; Elizabeth Fortier; Valerie Pocus; Susan Chimonas; Saul N Weingart
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 7.035

7.  Factors influencing prioritization for carpal tunnel syndrome consultation.

Authors:  Bryan Chung; Steven F Morris
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

8.  Surgical quality is more than volume: the association between changing urologists and complications for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eva H DuGoff; Justin E Bekelman; Elizabeth A Stuart; Katrina Armstrong; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  How do Physicians Decide to Refer Their Patients for Psychiatric Genetic Counseling? A Qualitative Study of Physicians' Practice.

Authors:  Emma Leach; Emily Morris; Hannah J White; Angela Inglis; Anna Lehman; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Gains, losses, and uncertainties from computerizing referrals and consultations.

Authors:  Michael Weiner; April Savoy; Barry C Barker
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.