Literature DB >> 11978231

Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.

Christopher B Forrest1, Paul A Nutting, Barbara Starfield, Sarah von Schrader.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine family physicians' referral decisions, which we conceptualized as having 2 phases: whether to refer followed by to whom to refer. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. POPULATION: All visits (N = 34,519) and new referrals (N = 2534) occurring during 15 consecutive business days in the offices of 141 family physicians in 87 practices located in 31 states. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Rates of referral, reasons for referral, practitioners referred to, health problems prompting referral, and reasons for selecting particular specialists.
RESULTS: Approximately 1 in 20 (5.1%) office visits led to referral. Although 68% of referrals were made by physicians during office visits, 18% were made by physicians during telephone conversations with patients, 11% by office staff with input from the physician, and 3% by staff without physician input. Physicians endorsed a mean of 1.8 reasons for making a referral. They sought specialists' advice on either diagnosis or treatment for 52.1% of referrals and asked the specialist to direct medical management for 25.9% and surgical management for 37.8%. Patient request was one reason for 13.6% of referrals. Fifty conditions accounted for 76% of all referrals. Surgical specialists were sent the largest share of referrals (45.4%), followed by medical specialists (31.0%), nonphysician clinicians (12.1%), obstetrician-gynecologists (4.6%), mental health professionals (4.2%), other practitioners (2.0%), and generalists (0.8%). Physicians recommended a specific practitioner to the patient for most (86.2%) referrals. Personal knowledge of the specialist was the most important reason for selecting a specific specialist.
CONCLUSIONS: Referrals are commonly made during encounters other than office visits, such as telephone conversations or staff-patient interactions, in primary care practice. Training in the referral process should ensure that family physicians obtain the skills necessary to expand their scope of practice, when appropriate; determine when and why a patient should be referred; and identify the type of practitioner to whom the patient should be sent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11978231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  32 in total

1.  Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

2.  William Pickles Lecture. Primary and specialty care interfaces: the imperative of disease continuity.

Authors:  Barbara Starfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Integrating health care for mothers and children in refugee camps and at district level.

Authors:  Assad Hafeez; Rubina Riaz; Samin Ullah Shah; Javed Pervaiz; David Southall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-03

Review 4.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

5.  Child and youth mental health service referrals: physicians' knowledge of mental health services and perceptions of a centralized intake model.

Authors:  Paula Cloutier; Mario Cappelli; J Elizabeth Glennie; Gilles Charron; Smita Thatte
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-02

6.  Barbara Starfield: passage of the pathfinder of primary care.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Perceptions of medical students about family medicine in Ghana.

Authors:  A Essuman; C Anthony-Krueger; T A Ndanu
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2013-12

8.  Analysis of the U.S. patient referral network.

Authors:  Chuankai An; A James O'Malley; Daniel N Rockmore; Corey D Stock
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  The effect of medical malpractice liability on rate of referrals received by specialist physicians.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Stephen J Spurr; Bin Nan; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law       Date:  2013-03-26

10.  Ambulatory care provided by office-based specialists in the United States.

Authors:  Jose M Valderas; Barbara Starfield; Christopher B Forrest; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.