Literature DB >> 2191657

Measurement of health status in the 1990s.

D L Patrick1, M Bergner.   

Abstract

The use of health-related quality of life measures, especially those based on function, are likely to increase during the next decade. This increase, however, is most likely to occur in clinical research and clinical practice. Unless the necessary political will, resources, data, and policy researchers coexist, there will be relatively little advance in the use of health status measures for decision-making and policy. This prediction is based on the observation that policy research tends to rely on available national data, that currently these data provide limited information about health status, and that there appears to be insufficient interest and resources to broaden data collection or to develop methods that incorporate a broad spectrum of health outcomes (e.g. death, impairment, functional status, and perceptions) into a single instrument or measure of health on large populations and communities. This state of affairs is particularly unfortunate as we face a decade in which available health and medical care may become more limited and social inequity in access and health status may become more marked. The effect of social inequities and restrictions to health care on the health of the nation cannot continue to be determined with reference only to the structure and process of the health care system. Health and quality of life outcomes are what count. And, these outcomes cannot be determined without appropriate and inclusive measures of health-related quality of life. Of course, we hope our prediction is wrong and that the motivation and resources will be found to help resolve methodologic issues in the measurement of population health status and quality of life and to provide the necessary data. We hope that government agencies, employers, and private providers will begin to collect health-related quality of life data on the constituents and populations they serve. Even if these data are imperfect or primitive, the effects of improving accessibility and quality of health care can only be assessed adequately in terms of the health-related quality of life of the nation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2191657     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.11.050190.001121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  45 in total

1.  Linking the health utilities index to National Medical Expenditure Survey data.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; S Pashko; R Friedkin; J Mullahy; J L Sindelar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  A national study of the importance of oral health to life quality to inform scales of oral health related quality of life.

Authors:  C McGrath; R Bedi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  The economic costs of asthma: a review and conceptual model.

Authors:  K B Weiss; S D Sullivan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Validation of the FACT-G scale for evaluating quality of life in cancer patients in Colombia.

Authors:  Ricardo Sánchez; Monica Ballesteros; Benjamin J Arnold
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A profile of state-level differences in the oral health of people with and without disabilities, in the U.S., in 2004.

Authors:  Brian S Armour; Mark Swanson; H Barry Waldman; Steven P Perlman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials: bibliographic study.

Authors:  C Sanders; M Egger; J Donovan; D Tallon; S Frankel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

Review 8.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  A closer look at quality of life in the hepatocellular carcinoma literature.

Authors:  Jenny L Firkins; Robin Tarter; Martha Driessnack; Lissi Hansen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Death of Parents and Adult Psychological and Physical Well-Being: A Prospective U.S. National Study.

Authors:  Nadine F Marks; Heyjung Jun; Jieun Song
Journal:  J Fam Issues       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.