Literature DB >> 10180752

Linking the health utilities index to National Medical Expenditure Survey data.

J A Rizzo1, S Pashko, R Friedkin, J Mullahy, J L Sindelar.   

Abstract

Measures of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) are becoming increasingly important in assessing the effects of chronic illness and healthcare interventions designed to treat them. Obtaining measures of HR-QOL for a nationally representative sample of individuals would enhance understanding of health status in the US, and promote further study of the economic causes and effects of health status. This study reports on our efforts to link a prominent HR-QOL scale, the Health Utilities Index Mark I (HUI), to the National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES). Six distinct algorithms were constructed for linking the HUI to NMES. These alternative linkage algorithms yielded HUI measures that were highly intercorrelated (p = 93 to 99%). Multivariate regression analyses performed to predict variations in HR-QOL revealed that the HUI exhibited good predictive validity--the HUI demonstrated lower quality of life for a variety of chronic illnesses, and wealthier individuals and better educated individuals had a higher quality of life. In contrast to some previous HR-QOL research, the present analysis demonstrates that: (i) cancer is negatively and significantly related to quality of life; and (ii) smoking is negatively and significantly related to quality of life. Overall, the results suggest that the HUI linkages to NMES provide reliable and valid measures of quality of life. As such, items from the NMES can be grouped and linked in such a way as to obtain health state utility values. These values should be of use to those who wish to understand the global health of the US population for policy-making efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10180752     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199813050-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  15 in total

Review 1.  Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index.

Authors:  D Feeny; W Furlong; M Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D L Patrick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health.

Authors:  M Gold; P Franks; P Erickson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Measurement of health status in the 1990s.

Authors:  D L Patrick; M Bergner
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 5.  Application of health status assessment measures in policy research.

Authors:  D M Steinwachs
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Using composite health status measures to assess the nation's health.

Authors:  P Erickson; E A Kendall; J P Anderson; R M Kaplan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care of very-low-birth-weight infants.

Authors:  M H Boyle; G W Torrance; J C Sinclair; S P Horwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Developing multiattribute health indexes.

Authors:  M H Boyle; G W Torrance
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Health-related quality-of-life assessment in medical care.

Authors:  A J McSweeny; T L Creer
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.800

10.  Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery.

Authors:  M J Sculpher; N Dwyer; S Byford; G M Stirrat
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1996-02
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Employers' benefits from workers' health insurance.

Authors:  Ellen O'Brien
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Modeled cost-effectiveness of the Experience Corps Baltimore based on a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Michelle C Carlson; Thomas A Glass; Sylvia McGill; George W Rebok; Crystal Simpson; Linda P Fried
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Utility scores for chronic conditions in a community-dwelling population.

Authors:  N Mittmann; K Trakas; N Risebrough; B A Liu
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Linking health-related quality-of-life indicators to large national data sets.

Authors:  J A Rizzo; J L Sindelar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients.

Authors:  M A Connolly; J A Johnson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  A cross-sectional study of health-related quality of life deficits in individuals with comorbid diabetes and cancer.

Authors:  Samantha L Bowker; Sheri L Pohar; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Medical costs and quality-adjusted life years associated with smoking: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shari P Feirman; Allison M Glasser; Lyubov Teplitskaya; David R Holtgrave; David B Abrams; Raymond S Niaura; Andrea C Villanti
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.