Literature DB >> 8888155

Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

K R Yabroff1, B P Linas, K Schulman.   

Abstract

Quality of life is used increasingly as a primary and secondary endpoint of clinical investigations of new therapies. Quality of life information may be especially useful for the assessment of cancer treatments, where increases in survival may be accompanied by detrimental side effects. The recognition of the importance of quality of life has led to the recent proliferation of cancer specific quality of life instruments. As more is understood about the heterogeneity of patient populations, however, we must assess how culturally defined factors may impact patient quality of life and its assessment. Quality of life instruments are diverse, ranging from those focusing on objective measures of functionality to those assessing subjective measures of patient preferences for their current health state. These instruments have been developed for use in the general population and for disease-specific populations. Assessment of the appropriateness of potential quality of life instruments in specific clinical settings, in addition to understanding the cultural diversity of the clinical population being studied, will guide the researcher in the choice of an appropriate quality of life instrument for cancer clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888155     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  184 in total

1.  A comparison of two survey measures of health status.

Authors:  R Leavey; D Wilkin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

3.  Quality of life measurement in testicular cancer patients.

Authors:  H W Herr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The effect of inadequate language translation on Hispanics' responses to health surveys.

Authors:  E Berkanovic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A randomized trial of physical rehabilitation for very frail nursing home residents.

Authors:  C D Mulrow; M B Gerety; D Kanten; J E Cornell; L A DeNino; L Chiodo; C Aguilar; M B O'Neil; J Rosenberg; R M Solis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Foreign-born and US-born black women: differences in health behaviors and birth outcomes.

Authors:  H Cabral; L E Fried; S Levenson; H Amaro; B Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Relationship between patient race and the intensity of hospital services.

Authors:  J Yergan; A B Flood; J P LoGerfo; P Diehr
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Breast cancer prevention and control among the medically underserved.

Authors:  J F Kerner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Beyond efficacy and effectiveness: conducting economic analyses during clinical trials.

Authors:  Teresa M Waters; Jeri A Logemann; Barbara Roa Pauloski; Alfred W Rademaker; Cathy L Lazarus; Lisa A Newman; Annette K Hamner
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Parents' reported preference scores for childhood atopic dermatitis disease states.

Authors:  Joëlle Y Friedman; Shelby D Reed; Kevin P Weinfurt; Kristijan H Kahler; Emmanuel B Walter; Kevin A Schulman
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 2.125

4.  Quality of life and understanding of disease status among cancer patients of different ethnic origin.

Authors:  N Tchen; P Bedard; Q-L Yi; M Klein; D Cella; S Eremenco; I F Tannock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.