Literature DB >> 21913001

Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences.

Michael P Kaschak1, Timothy J Kutta, John L Jones.   

Abstract

We explored the claim that structural priming is a case of implicit learning within the language production system. The experiment began with a baseline phase, in which we assessed participants' rates of production for double object and prepositional object constructions. Then participants were biased toward the production of either the double object or prepositional object construction. Finally, we again assessed participants' rates of production for the target constructions. Consistent with claims that structural priming is a case of implicit learning, we found that biasing participants toward the prepositional object construction produced stronger cumulative priming effects than did biasing participants toward the double object construction. We also found that individual differences in implicit learning were marginally correlated with overall rates of production for the double object construction. Participants who scored better on the learning task tended to produce fewer double object constructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913001      PMCID: PMC4612612          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0157-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning?

Authors:  K Bock; Z M Griffin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-06

2.  Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production.

Authors:  R J Hartsuiker; C Westenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

3.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production.

Authors:  Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-10

4.  What this construction needs is generalized.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning.

Authors:  Guido F Gebauer; Nicholas J Mackintosh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Long-term structural priming affects subsequent patterns of language production.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

7.  Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?

Authors:  Sarah Bernolet; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-19

8.  Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

9.  Patterns of experience with verbs affect long-term cumulative structural priming.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Coyle; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

10.  Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension.

Authors:  Justine B Wells; Morten H Christiansen; David S Race; Daniel J Acheson; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  15 in total

1.  Verb Variability and Morphosyntactic Priming With Typically Developing 2- and 3-Year-Olds.

Authors:  Windi C Krok; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  How Do Different Types of Alignment Affect Perceived Entity Status?

Authors:  Tailer G Ransom; Rick Dale; Roger J Kreuz; Deborah Tollefsen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-10

3.  Changes in task-extrinsic context do not affect the persistence of long-term cumulative structural priming.

Authors:  Timothy J Kutta; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-10-25

4.  Long and Short Term Cumulative Structural Priming Effects.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; Jacqueline M Coyle
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.331

5.  Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Implicit learning of structure occurs in parallel with lexically-mediated syntactic priming effects in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

8.  The role of explicit memory in syntactic persistence: Effects of lexical cueing and load on sentence memory and sentence production.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Sarah Bernolet; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Reciprocal Effects of Self-Regulation, Semantic Knowledge, and Reading Comprehension in Early Elementary School.

Authors:  Carol McDonald Connor; Stephanie L Day; Beth Phillips; Nicole Sparapani; Sarah W Ingebrand; Leigh McLean; Angela Barrus; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-06-05

10.  Female fertility affects men's linguistic choices.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Coyle; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.