Literature DB >> 20034624

Does verb bias modulate syntactic priming?

Sarah Bernolet1, Robert J Hartsuiker.   

Abstract

In a corpus analysis of spontaneous speech Jaeger and Snider (2007) found that the strength of structural priming is correlated with verb alternation bias. This finding is consistent with an implicit learning account of syntactic priming: because the implicit learning model implemented by Chang (2002), Chang, Dell, and Bock (2006), and Chang, Dell, Bock, and Griffin (2000) uses probabilistic information about different verb-structure combinations to predict the form of sentences, it predicts that primes exert stronger priming when they are less expected, given the syntactic preference of their main verb. We tested this claim experimentally by comparing the strength of double-object dative priming (DO) and prepositional object dative priming (PO) between dative verbs with differing syntactic preferences in a syntactic priming experiment. The syntactic preferences of the prime and target verbs were first measured in a picture description experiment. Consistent with an implicit learning account, the results showed a verb-specific effect of inverse preference: the strength of DO-priming was modulated by the alternation bias of the dative verbs that were used in the primes. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20034624     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  18 in total

Review 1.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Where are the cookies? Two- and three-year-olds use number-marked verbs to anticipate upcoming nouns.

Authors:  Cynthia Lukyanenko; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-11-09

3.  Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; John L Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

5.  Long-term cumulative structural priming persists for (at least) one week.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; Christopher Schatschneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

6.  Verb biases are shaped through lifelong learning.

Authors:  Rachel A Ryskin; Zhenghan Qi; Melissa C Duff; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

9.  The representation of plural inflectional affixes in English: Evidence from priming in an auditory lexical decision task.

Authors:  Amy Goodwin Davies; David Embick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Do you what I say? People reconstruct the syntax of anomalous utterances.

Authors:  Iva Ivanova; Holly P Branigan; Janet F McLean; Albert Costa; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.