Literature DB >> 30963376

How Do Different Types of Alignment Affect Perceived Entity Status?

Tailer G Ransom1, Rick Dale2, Roger J Kreuz3, Deborah Tollefsen4.   

Abstract

Perceptions of entitativity are thought to be influenced by salient features such as the physical proximity and physical similarity of group members (Campbell in Behav Sci 3:14-25, 1958). But social interactions among group members involve a number of low-level alignment (Pickering and Garrod in Behav Brain Sci 27:212-225, 2004) and synchronization (Marsh et al. in Top Cogn Sci 1:320-339, 2009) processes. Conversational partners, for instance, become aligned in syntax, semantics, emotion, and bodily posture. In this paper, we explore whether alignment correlates with observers' judgments of entitativity, and, moreover, which specific forms of alignment have the strongest effects on these judgments. Results revealed that only emotional alignment had on effect on judgments of entitativity. We discuss how future work may further assess the role of various dimensions in shaping the perception of group status in linguistic interaction.

Keywords:  Affect; Alignment; Entitativity; Interaction; Social cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963376     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-019-09642-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  14 in total

1.  Group entitativity and group perception: associations between physical features and psychological judgment.

Authors:  N Dasgupta; M R Banaji; R P Abelson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue.

Authors:  H P Branigan; M J Pickering; A A Cleland
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-05-15

3.  Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity.

Authors:  B Lickel; D L Hamilton; G Wieczorkowska; A Lewis; S J Sherman; A N Uhles
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2000-02

4.  Psychological distance and group judgments: the effect of physical distance on beliefs about common goals.

Authors:  Marlone D Henderson
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2009-07-22

5.  Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.

Authors:  S E Brennan; H H Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Conversational flow and entitativity: the role of status.

Authors:  Namkje Koudenburg; Tom Postmes; Ernestine H Gordijn
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2013-02-22

7.  Affect, verbal content, and psychophysiology in the arguments of couples with a violent husband.

Authors:  N S Jacobson; J M Gottman; J Waltz; R Rushe; J Babcock; A Holtzworth-Munroe
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1994-10

8.  Structural priming as implicit learning: cumulative priming effects and individual differences.

Authors:  Michael P Kaschak; Timothy J Kutta; John L Jones
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12

9.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23

10.  Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized.

Authors:  Max M Louwerse; Rick Dale; Ellen G Bard; Patrick Jeuniaux
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.