Literature DB >> 15570202

Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma.

T Lerut1, P Nafteux, J Moons, W Coosemans, G Decker, P De Leyn, D Van Raemdonck, N Ectors.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy on staging, disease-free survival, and 5-year survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ).
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy is mainly performed in Japan. Data from Western experience with 3-field lymphadenectomy are scarce and dealing with relatively small numbers. As a result, its role in the surgical practice of cancer of the esophagus and GEJ remains controversial.
METHODS: Between 1991 and 1999, primary surgery with 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed in 192 patients, of whom a cohort of 174 R0 resections was used for further analysis.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality of the whole series was 1.2%. Overall morbidity was 58%. Pulmonary complications occurred in 32.8%, cardiac dysrhythmias in 10.9%, and persistent recurrent nerve problems in 2.6%. pTNM staging was as follows: stage 0, 0.6%; stage I, 9.2%; stage II, 27.6%; stage III, 28.7%; and stage IV, 33.9%. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 51% and 41.9%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 51.4% and 46.3%, respectively. Locoregional lymph node recurrence was 5.2%; no patient developed an isolated cervical lymph node recurrence. Five-year survival for node-negative patients was 80.2% versus 24.5% for node-positive patients. Five-year survival by stage was 100% in stages 0 and I, 59.1% in stage II, 36.8% in stage III, and 13.3% in stage IV. Twenty-three percent of the patients with adenocarcinoma (25.8% distal third and 17.6% GEJ) and 25% of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (26.2% middle third) had positive cervical nodes resulting in a change of pTNM staging specifically related to the unforeseen cervical lymph node involvement in 12%. Cervical lymph node involvement was unforeseen in 75.6% of patients with cervical nodes at pathologic examinations. Five-year survival for patients with positive cervical nodes was 27.7% for middle third squamous cell carcinoma. For distal third adenocarcinomas, 4-year survival was 35.7% and 5-year survival 11.9%. No GEJ adenocarcinoma with positive cervical nodes survived for 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. The prevalence of involved cervical nodes is high, regardless of the type and location of tumor resulting in a change of final staging specifically related to the cervical field in 12% of this series. Overall 5-year and disease-free survival after R0 resection of 41.9% and 46.3%, respectively, may indicate a real survival benefit. A 5-year survival of 27.2% in patients with positive cervical nodes in middle third carcinomas indicates that these nodes should be considered as regional (N1) rather than distant metastasis (M1b) in middle third carcinomas. These patients seem to benefit from a 3-field lymphadenectomy. The role of 3-field lymphadenectomy in distal third adenocarcinoma remains investigational.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15570202      PMCID: PMC1356512          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000145925.70409.d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  16 in total

1.  Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  K Isono; H Sato; K Nakayama
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.935

2.  Micrometastasis and tumor cell microinvolvement of lymph nodes from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: frequency, associated tumor characteristics, and impact on prognosis.

Authors:  S Natsugoe; J Mueller; H J Stein; M Feith; H Höfler; J R Siewert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.

Authors:  F H Ellis; G J Heatley; M J Krasna; W A Williamson; K Balogh
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  A prospective randomized trial of extended cervical and superior mediastinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  T Nishihira; K Hirayama; S Mori
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J W van Sandick; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Extended radical esophagectomy for superficially invasive carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  T Nishimaki; T Suzuki; T Kanda; I Obinata; S Komukai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama; M Tsurumaru; H Udagawa; Y Kajiyama
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pattern of recurrence following subtotal oesophagectomy with two field lymphadenectomy

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Transhiatal esophagectomy for benign and malignant disease.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M C Stirling
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Surgical strategies in esophageal carcinoma with emphasis on radical lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; P De Leyn; W Coosemans; D Van Raemdonck; I Scheys; E LeSaffre
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  105 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  A meta-analysis of lymph node metastasis rate for patients with thoracic oesophageal cancer and its implication in delineation of clinical target volume for radiation therapy.

Authors:  X Ding; J Zhang; B Li; Z Wang; W Huang; T Zhou; Y Wei; H Li
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Overview of multimodal therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Kei Hosoda; Keishi Yamashita; Natusya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-01

Review 4.  Cervical lymph node metastases from remote primary tumor sites.

Authors:  Fernando López; Juan P Rodrigo; Carl E Silver; Missak Haigentz; Justin A Bishop; Primož Strojan; Dana M Hartl; Patrick J Bradley; William M Mendenhall; Carlos Suárez; Robert P Takes; Marc Hamoir; K Thomas Robbins; Ashok R Shaha; Jochen A Werner; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Detection of lymph node involvement by cytokeratin immunohistochemistry is an independent prognostic factor after curative resection of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Goran Marjanovic; Markus Schricker; Axel Walch; Axel zur Hausen; Ulrich T Hopt; Andreas Imdahl; Frank Makowiec
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Surgical outcomes in esophageal cancer patients with tumor recurrence after curative esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Syoichi Fujii; Takashi Kosaka; Hidetaka A Ono; Yuichi Otsuka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Yasushi Ichikawa; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Roderich E Schwarz; David D Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Penile and intramuscular metastases from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A rare case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Zou Ci; Yu Dexin; Wang Qi; Zhang Tao; Xie Dongdong; Wang Yi; Ding Demao; Chen Lei; Min Jie; Zhang Zhiqiang; Ma Jiaxing; Wang Daming
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yasunori Akutsu; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-26

10.  Extended esophagectomy in elderly patients with esophageal cancer: minor effect of age alone in determining the postoperative course and survival.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; D J Bosch; M W N Nijsten; M G G Rodgers; H Groen; J P J Slaets; J Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.