Literature DB >> 21897320

Treatment of the atretic ear with round window vibrant soundbridge implantation in infants and children: electrocochleography and audiologic outcomes.

Marco Mandalà1, Liliana Colletti, Vittorio Colletti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcomes of the first 5 infants and 9 children with congenital aural atresia (CAA) who had undergone hearing rehabilitation using the MED-EL Vibrant Soundbridge with intraoperative assistance of electrocochleography (ECoG) for optimal fitting of the floating mass transducer (FMT) on the round window (RW) membrane. STUDY
DESIGN: Tertiary referral medical center; retrospective case series. PATIENTS: Infants and children ranging in age from 2 months to 16 years with a moderate-to-severe conductive or mixed hearing loss with CAA. For comparison, the study population was divided into 2 groups: older children (≥5 yr of age; 5 patients) and younger children/infants (<5 yr of age; 9 subjects) who were submitted to different audiologic tests appropriate for their age and general condition. INTERVENTION: RW implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Compound action potential threshold and amplitude were assessed as a function of different methods for stabilizing the FMT on the RW. Pure tone audiogram at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, free-field speech testing (older children), bone conduction and free-field auditory brainstem response (ABR; younger children and infants), intraoperative and postoperative complications, and FMT displacement or extrusion rate.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed with ECoG recordings between pre- and post-FMT-RW membrane optimization with fascia and cartilage (p < 0.001). Significant improvements were observed in speech perception and pure-tone and ABR threshold, immediately after surgery and at follow-up intervals (12-65 mo) in children and infants (p < 0.01). No complications or instances of device extrusion were observed.
CONCLUSION: Infants and children with moderate-to-severe conductive or mixed hearing loss, not suitable or unwilling to accept Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids and who would not tolerate traditional bone and air conduction hearing aids, obtain substantial benefit with the FMT-RW implantation procedure. Intraoperative ECoG is of significant help in achieving the best FMT-RW fitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21897320     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e9513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  The vibrating ossicular prosthesis in children and adolescents: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Susen Lailach; Thomas Zahnert; Jan Maurer; John-Martin Hempel; Assen Koitschev; Daniela Hollfelder; Henning Frenzel; Barbara Wollenberg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Vibrant Soundbridge® in preschool children with unilateral aural atresia: acceptance and benefit.

Authors:  M Leinung; E Zaretsky; B P Lange; V Hoffmann; T Stöver; C Hey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  [Differential indication of active middle ear implants].

Authors:  K Braun; H-P Zenner; N Friese; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Efficacy of Auditory Implants for Patients With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Depends on Implant Center.

Authors:  Ad Snik; Hannes Maier; Bill Hodgetts; Martin Kompis; Griet Mertens; Paul van de Heyning; Thomas Lenarz; Arjan Bosman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  [Hearing rehabilitation with the Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with congenital middle ear malformation].

Authors:  J M Hempel; A Epp; V Volgger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Round Window Application of an Active Middle Ear Implant: A Comparison With Hearing Aid Usage in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Usami; Haruo Takahashi; Yukihiko Kanda; Tetsuya Tono; Katsumi Doi; Kozo Kumakawa; Kiyofumi Gyo; Yasushi Naito; Sho Kanzaki; Noboru Yamanaka; Kimitaka Kaga
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Clinical feasibility of a novel test setup for objective measurements using the VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE.

Authors:  Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Philipp Schörg; Stefan Edlinger; Marlene Ploder; Astrid Magele
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 10.  Contemporary hearing rehabilitation options in patients with aural atresia.

Authors:  Jacky F W Lo; Willis S S Tsang; Joannie Y K Yu; Osan Y M Ho; Peter K M Ku; Michael C F Tong
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.