Literature DB >> 21895396

Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).

Thomas A Farmer1, Padraic Monaghan, Jennifer B Misyak, Morten H Christiansen.   

Abstract

In 2 separate self-paced reading experiments, Farmer, Christiansen, and Monaghan (2006) found that the degree to which a word's phonology is typical of other words in its lexical category influences online processing of nouns and verbs in predictive contexts. Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009) failed to find an effect of phonological typicality when they combined stimuli from the separate experiments into a single experiment. We replicated Staub et al.'s experiment and found that the combination of stimulus sets affects the predictiveness of the syntactic context; this reduces the phonological typicality effect as the experiment proceeds, although the phonological typicality effect was still evident early in the experiment. Although an ambiguous context may diminish sensitivity to the probabilistic relationship between the sound of a word and its lexical category, phonological typicality does influence online sentence processing during normal reading when the syntactic context is predictive of the lexical category of upcoming words. (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895396     DOI: 10.1037/a0023063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of noun and verb differences in ventral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Christine Boylan; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  The effect of character contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.

Authors:  Qingrong Chen; Guoxia Zhao; Xin Huang; Yiming Yang; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Learning Additional Languages as Hierarchical Probabilistic Inference: Insights From First Language Processing.

Authors:  Bozena Pajak; Alex B Fine; Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Learn       Date:  2016-03-14

4.  Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair "morpheme" learning.

Authors:  Amy S Finn; Carla L Hudson Kam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Readers generalize adaptation to newly-encountered dialectal structures to other unfamiliar structures.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Interpreting prosodic cues in discourse context.

Authors:  Meredith Brown; Anne Pier Salverda; Christine Gunlogson; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  (Early) context effects on event-related potentials over natural inputs.

Authors:  Shaorong Yan; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Extracting phonological patterns for L2 word learning: the effect of poor phonological awareness.

Authors:  Chieh-Fang Hu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

9.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: syntactic priming is affected by the prime's prediction error given both prior and recent experience.

Authors:  T Florian Jaeger; Neal E Snider
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.