OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer negatively influences quality of life (QOL) in survivors and the people with whom they are close. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the degree of dyadic interdependence in psychological QOL in dyads adjusting to prostate cancer and its treatment. METHOD: Participants were 70 prostate cancer survivors and their partners, most of whom were spouses. Assessments of psychological QOL (i.e., depression, anxiety, fatigue, and positive affect) were made at three points in time, each separated by 8 weeks. RESULTS: Survivors' prostate specific function was associated with both their own and their partners' psychological QOL. There was evidence of longitudinal dyadic interdependence for psychological QOL, particularly from partners to survivors between the T2 and T3 assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate cancer survivors' psychological QOL is affected substantially by their partners' psychological QOL, consistent with theories of emotional contagion.
OBJECTIVE:Prostate cancer negatively influences quality of life (QOL) in survivors and the people with whom they are close. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the degree of dyadic interdependence in psychological QOL in dyads adjusting to prostate cancer and its treatment. METHOD:Participants were 70 prostate cancer survivors and their partners, most of whom were spouses. Assessments of psychological QOL (i.e., depression, anxiety, fatigue, and positive affect) were made at three points in time, each separated by 8 weeks. RESULTS: Survivors' prostate specific function was associated with both their own and their partners' psychological QOL. There was evidence of longitudinal dyadic interdependence for psychological QOL, particularly from partners to survivors between the T2 and T3 assessments. CONCLUSIONS:Prostate cancer survivors' psychological QOL is affected substantially by their partners' psychological QOL, consistent with theories of emotional contagion.
Authors: J L Stanford; Z Feng; A S Hamilton; F D Gilliland; R A Stephenson; J W Eley; P C Albertsen; L C Harlan; A L Potosky Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-01-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Terry A Badger; Chris Segrin; Aurelio J Figueredo; Joanne Harrington; Kate Sheppard; Stacey Passalacqua; Alice Pasvogel; Maria Bishop Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2010-12-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Gunnar Steineck; Fred Helgesen; Jan Adolfsson; Paul W Dickman; Jan-Erik Johansson; Bo Johan Norlén; Lars Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-09-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Russel L Thompson; Sharon L Lewis; Margaret R Murphy; Jennifer M Hale; Paula H Blackwell; Gayle J Acton; Dorothy H Clough; Graham J Patrick; Peter N Bonner Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Benjamin D Capistrant; Lindsey Lesher; Nidhi Kohli; Enyinnaya N Merengwa; Badrinath Konety; Darryl Mitteldorf; William G West; B R Simon Rosser Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Christine Paul; Alix Hall; Christopher Oldmeadow; Marita Lynagh; Sharon Campbell; Ken Bradstock; Anna Williamson; Mariko Carey; Rob Sanson-Fisher Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Dhurata Ivziku; Marco Clari; Michela Piredda; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Maria Matarese Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Janet Harden; Martin G Sanda; John Thomas Wei; Hossein N Yarandi; Larry Hembroff; Jill Hardy; Laurel Northouse Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.172