Literature DB >> 24161635

Survivorship after prostate cancer treatment: spouses' quality of life at 36 months.

Janet Harden1, Martin G Sanda, John Thomas Wei, Hossein N Yarandi, Larry Hembroff, Jill Hardy, Laurel Northouse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effects of prostate cancer treatment on spouse quality of life (QOL) at 36 months following treatment.
DESIGN: Descriptive-exploratory; community-based study.
SETTING: Telephone interviews. SAMPLE: 95 female spouses of men treated for early-stage prostate cancer.
METHODS: A computer-assisted telephone interview was used to evaluate QOL among spouses of prostate cancer survivors at 36 months after initial prostate cancer treatment. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Lymphedema, demographic information, self-reported comorbid diseases or medical issues, and medication usage.
FINDINGS: Spouses who had more negative appraisal of caregiving had lower sexual satisfaction, poorer cancer-specific QOL, and poorer mental QOL. Spouses who perceived bother related to the patient's sexual or hormone function reported more threatening appraisals of caregiving, less sexual satisfaction, and poorer QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Spouses continued to experience negative appraisal of caregiving, which affected QOL 36 months after their husbands' treatment for prostate cancer. Additional studies related to factors that influence spouse QOL during survivorship will help guide clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Healthcare providers must help spouses find strategies that promote positive coping and lessen negative appraisal. Giving caregivers information early in the treatment process will help them understand what to expect over time. Supporting caregivers and helping them manage stress will enhance QOL during survivorship. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Spouses who experienced more bother related to urinary, sexual, and hormonal function experience more stress and worse QOL at 36 months post-treatment. Spouse appraisal can have a significant effect on QOL. Offering counseling to couples following treatment for prostate cancer may improve QOL by helping couples manage relationship intimacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24161635      PMCID: PMC3943427          DOI: 10.1188/13.ONF.567-573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  36 in total

1.  Quality of life: conceptual issues.

Authors:  C E Ferrans
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.315

2.  Development and validation of a brief version of the dyadic adjustment scale with a nonparametric item analysis model.

Authors:  Stéphane Sabourin; Pierre Valois; Yvan Lussier
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2005-03

3.  The Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) scale: development and validation of an instrument to measure quality of life of the family caregiver of patients with cancer.

Authors:  M A Weitzner; P B Jacobsen; H Wagner; J Friedland; C Cox
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Problem-solving and distress in prostate cancer patients and their spousal caregivers.

Authors:  Celine M Ko; Vanessa L Malcarne; James W Varni; Scott C Roesch; Rajni Banthia; Helen L Greenbergs; Georgia Robins Sadler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Presurgery experiences of prostate cancer patients and their spouses.

Authors:  R E Gray; M I Fitch; C Phillips; M Labrecque; L Klotz
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1999 May-Jun

7.  Posttraumatic growth in prostate cancer survivors and their partners.

Authors:  Andrea A Thornton; Martin A Perez
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care.

Authors:  A B Kornblith; H W Herr; U S Ofman; H I Scher; J C Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Cancer in married couples: higher or lower distress?

Authors:  L Baider; N Walach; S Perry; A Kaplan De-Nour
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.006

View more
  10 in total

1.  Social Support and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Gay and Bisexual Men With Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin D Capistrant; Lindsey Lesher; Nidhi Kohli; Enyinnaya N Merengwa; Badrinath Konety; Darryl Mitteldorf; William G West; B R Simon Rosser
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Couple-focused interventions for men with localized prostate cancer and their spouses: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Deborah A Kashy; Talia Zaider; David Kissane; David Lee; Isaac Y Kim; Carolyn J Heckman; Frank J Penedo; Evangelynn Murphy; Shannon Myers Virtue
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2019-03-10

3.  Who cares? The impact on caregivers of suspected mining-related lung cancer.

Authors:  N Lightfoot; L MacEwan; L Tufford; D L Holness; C Mayer; D M Kramer
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Impact of informal cancer caregiving across the cancer experience: A systematic literature review of quality of life.

Authors:  Carol Y Ochoa; Natasha Buchanan Lunsford; Judith Lee Smith
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2020-04

5.  Enhancing survivorship care planning for patients with localized prostate cancer using a couple-focused web-based, mHealth program: the results of a pilot feasibility study.

Authors:  Lixin Song; Peiran Guo; Xianming Tan; Ronald C Chen; Matthew E Nielsen; Sarah A Birken; Bridget F Koontz; Laurel L Northouse; Deborah K Mayer
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 6.  Achieving optimal delivery of follow-up care for prostate cancer survivors: improving patient outcomes.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Denalee M O'Malley; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2015-03-19

7.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of personalised care after treatment for prostate cancer (TOPCAT-P): nurse-led holistic-needs assessment and individualised psychoeducational intervention: study protocol.

Authors:  Marian Andrei Stanciu; Caroline Morris; Matt Makin; Eila Watson; Jenna Bulger; Richard Evans; Julia Hiscock; Zoë Hoare; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Richard David Neal; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Quality of life of caregiver spouses of veterans with bilateral lower extremity amputations.

Authors:  Ali Moradi; Mohammad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Mohamad Reza Soroush
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2015-01-18

9.  Cognitive-Behavioral Coping, Illness Perception, and Family Adaptability in Oncological Patients with a Family History of Cancer.

Authors:  Roxana Postolica; Magdalena Iorga; Florin Dumitru Petrariu; Doina Azoicai
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Adoption, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of a Mobile Health App for Personalized Prostate Cancer Survivorship Care: Protocol for a Realist Case Study of the Ned App.

Authors:  Quynh Pham; Joseph A Cafazzo; Andrew Feifer
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-10-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.