Literature DB >> 18003867

Auditory and visual lexical neighborhoods in audiovisual speech perception.

Nancy Tye-Murray1, Mitchell Sommers, Brent Spehar.   

Abstract

Much evidence suggests that the mental lexicon is organized into auditory neighborhoods, with words that are phonologically similar belonging to the same neighborhood. In this investigation, we considered the existence of visual neighborhoods. When a receiver watches someone speak a word, a neighborhood of homophenes (ie, words that look alike on the face, such as pat and bat) is activated. The simultaneous activation of a word's auditory and visual neighborhoods may, in part, account for why individuals recognize speech better in an auditory-visual condition than what would be predicted by their performance in audition-only and vision-only conditions. A word test was administered to 3 groups of participants in audition-only, vision-only, and auditory-visual conditions, in the presence of 6-talker babble. Test words with sparse visual neighborhoods were recognized more accurately than words with dense neighborhoods in a vision-only condition. Densities of both the acoustic and visual neighborhoods as well as their intersection overlap were predictive of how well the test words were recognized in the auditory-visual condition. These results suggest that visual neighborhoods exist and that they affect auditory-visual speech perception. One implication is that in the presence of dual sensory impairment, the boundaries of both acoustic and visual neighborhoods may shift, adversely affecting speech recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18003867      PMCID: PMC4111531          DOI: 10.1177/1084713807307409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  13 in total

1.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

2.  Talker and lexical effects on audiovisual word recognition by adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Adam R Kaiser; Karen Iler Kirk; Lorin Lachs; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Speech perception using combinations of auditory, visual, and tactile information.

Authors:  P J Blamey; R S Cowan; J I Alcantara; L A Whitford; G M Clark
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1989

4.  Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.

Authors:  L D Braida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

5.  Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.

Authors:  K W Grant; B E Walden; P F Seitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Guidelines for determining threshold level for speech.

Authors: 
Journal:  ASHA       Date:  1988-03

8.  Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell S Sommers; Brent Spehar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  23 in total

1.  Semantic Integration and Age of Acquisition Effects in Code-Blend Comprehension.

Authors:  Marcel R Giezen; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-10

2.  Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Sizing up the competition: quantifying the influence of the mental lexicon on auditory and visual spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Julia F Strand; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Preschoolers benefit from visually salient speech cues.

Authors:  Kaylah Lalonde; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Matching heard and seen speech: An ERP study of audiovisual word recognition.

Authors:  Natalya Kaganovich; Jennifer Schumaker; Courtney Rowland
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Assessing multimodal spoken word-in-sentence recognition in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Karen Iler Kirk; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  Investigating speechreading and deafness.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  Prediction and constraint in audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Jonathan E Peelle; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  There Goes the Neighborhood: Lipreading and the Structure of the Mental Lexicon.

Authors:  Julia Feld; Mitchell Sommers
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.