Literature DB >> 21895093

Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?

Tobias Neher1, Søren Laugesen, Niels Søgaard Jensen, Louise Kragelund.   

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify the basic auditory and cognitive processes that affect listeners' performance on two spatial listening tasks: sound localization and speech recognition in spatially complex, multi-talker situations. Twenty-three elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing impairments were tested on the two spatial listening tasks, a measure of monaural spectral ripple discrimination, a measure of binaural temporal fine structure (TFS) sensitivity, and two (visual) cognitive measures indexing working memory and attention. All auditory test stimuli were spectrally shaped to restore (partial) audibility for each listener on each listening task. Eight younger normal-hearing listeners served as a control group. Data analyses revealed that the chosen auditory and cognitive measures could predict neither sound localization accuracy nor speech recognition when the target and maskers were separated along the front-back dimension. When the competing talkers were separated along the left-right dimension, however, speech recognition performance was significantly correlated with the attentional measure. Furthermore, supplementary analyses indicated additional effects of binaural TFS sensitivity and average low-frequency hearing thresholds. Altogether, these results are in support of the notion that both bottom-up and top-down deficits are responsible for the impaired functioning of elderly hearing-impaired listeners in cocktail party-like situations.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21895093     DOI: 10.1121/1.3608122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  35 in total

1.  Use of a glimpsing model to understand the performance of listeners with and without hearing loss in spatialized speech mixtures.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Elin Roverud; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Revisiting the detection of interaural time differences in listeners with hearing loss.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  [Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking. German version].

Authors:  S Rählmann; H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Speech audiometric assessment of informational masking.

Authors:  S Rählmann; H Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Free-field study on auditory localization and discrimination performance in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Kristina Schmiedchen; Ines Nitsche; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adaptive spatial filtering improves speech reception in noise while preserving binaural cues.

Authors:  Susan R S Bissmeyer; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Laboratory and field study of the potential benefits of pinna cue-preserving hearing aids.

Authors:  Niels Søgaard Jensen; Tobias Neher; Søren Laugesen; René Burmand Johannesson; Louise Kragelund
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-11-10

10.  Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants: predicting performance from basic psychophysical measures.

Authors:  Stefan Kerber; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.