Literature DB >> 22083341

Measuring sensitivity to conflicts of interest: a preliminary test of method.

Rebecca Ann Lind1, Tammy Swenson-Lepper.   

Abstract

This study presents and develops test methods for assessing sensitivity to conflict of interest (COIsen). We are aware of no study assessing COIsen, but note that some popular methods for assessing ethical sensitivity and related constructs (which include COIsen) are flawed in that their presentation of stimulus material to subjects actually guides subjects to attend to ethical (or related) issues. The method tested here was designed to avoid this flaw. Using adaptations of two existing cases, a quota sample of 12 students was interviewed. Our method used funnel-sequenced, open-ended interviews that were audiotaped and transcribed, then subjected to a form of cognitive mapping. These maps revealed the presence of "indicators" of COIsen. We found that COIsen can be measured and that the global COIsen score generated by our method is able to reveal much variation across subjects, making it a worthwhile candidate for further consideration.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083341     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9319-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  3 in total

1.  Sensitivity to research misconduct: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Rebecca Ann Lind; Tammy Swenson Lepper
Journal:  Med Law       Date:  2007-09

2.  Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which public health service funding is sought and responsible prospective contractors. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-08-25

3.  Measuring dental students' ethical sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Bebeau; J R Rest; C M Yamoor
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 2.264

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.