Literature DB >> 21888511

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses.

Timothy Caulfield1, Amy L McGuire.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing has attracted a great amount of attention from policy makers, the scientific community, professional groups, and the media. Although it is unclear what the public demand is for these services, there does appear to be public interest in personal genetic risk information. As a result, many commentators have raised a variety of social, ethical, and regulatory issues associated with this emerging industry, including privacy issues, ensuring that DTC companies provide accurate information about the risks and limitations of their services, the possible adverse impact of DTC genetic testing on healthcare systems, and concern about how individuals may interpret and react to genetic risk information.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21888511     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-062110-123753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Med        ISSN: 0066-4219            Impact factor:   13.739


  45 in total

1.  Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Lauren C Sayres; Jaime S King; Mary E Norton; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.

Authors:  D L Boeldt; N J Schork; E J Topol; C S Bloss
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Marketing of personalized cancer care on the web: an analysis of Internet websites.

Authors:  Stacy W Gray; Angel Cronin; Elizabeth Bair; Neal Lindeman; Vish Viswanath; Katherine A Janeway
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.

Authors:  Lauren Badalato; Louiza Kalokairinou; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: A landscape analysis of reviews.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Anna Gaysynsky; Melinda Krakow; Ashley Elrick; Muin J Khoury; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

7.  Information-seeking and sharing behavior following genomic testing for diabetes risk.

Authors:  Rachel Mills; Jill Powell; William Barry; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.

Authors:  Jean E McEwen; Joy T Boyer; Kathie Y Sun
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Best ethical practices for clinicians and laboratories in the provision of noninvasive prenatal testing.

Authors:  M A Allyse; L C Sayres; M Havard; J S King; H T Greely; L Hudgins; J Taylor; M E Norton; M K Cho; D Magnus; K E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.050

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.